J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol Search

CLOSE


J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol > Volume 16(3); 2025 > Article
Zhang, Dong, Gu, Feng, Wang, Yang, Peng, and Shi: Effect of SO42– Concentration on Electrochemical Corrosion Behavior of PCB-Cu under Thin Liquid Film

Abstract

The electrochemical corrosion behavior of PCB-Cu under thin liquid film was investigated with varying concentrations of SO42– through polarization curves and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The results indicate that the corrosion process of PCB-Cu was primarily controlled by the reduction of oxygen and the corrosion products. The cathodic current density increased with the concentration improvement of SO42–. Initially, the corrosion rate was dominated by the cathodic reduction process, however, in later stages of corrosion, the accumulation of surface corrosion products inhibited further corrosion of PCB-Cu.

INTRODUCTION

Electronic components in integrated circuits are a core part of electronics and communication technologies, which are highly susceptible to atmospheric corrosion in the operational environments [13]. When corrosion occurs in the metal layers of electronic components, the electrical properties of the surrounding areas change accordingly, ultimately leading to the failure of the device. Moreover, with the increasing integration and miniaturization of electronic devices, the tolerance for faults due to corrosion becomes even more stringent. Therefore, the study of corrosion issues in electronic components is of significant importance.
More than 90% of electronic components operate in atmospheric environments, making atmospheric corrosion their primary form of degradation. Atmospheric corrosion typically occurs under electrolyte films, where the thickness of these films directly impacts critical corrosion processes such as the diffusion of dissolved oxygen, the formation of corrosion products, and the hydration of metal ions [46]. When the environmental humidity is between 65% and 100%, the thickness of the liquid film is typically less than 10 μm, and oxygen along with trace contaminants are sufficient to initiate corrosion. Corrosion under thin liquid films is a critical process in the initial stages of atmospheric corrosion.
Copper is a crucial material for printed circuit board (PCB) in the electronics industry, which is prone to corrosion in atmospheric environments [7,8]. While PCB-Cu is typically applied as an extremely micron level thin layer on the surface of the substrate, resulting in a much larger contact area with the environment. And the operating environment of of PCB-Cu often includes high-temperatures, high-humidity, or chemical contaminants, making its high susceptibility to corrosion. Especially in work environments with high concentrations of pollutants, such as livestock farms and chemical plants, the atmospheric content of corrosive media like SO2 is very high, leading to the formation of sulfur-containing corrosive media on material surfaces, further to cause the corrosion of PCB-Cu [9]. Thus, this study investigated the effect of SO2 concentration on the corrosion behavior of PCB-Cu under thin liquid film. The polarization curve and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy tests were conducted to evaluate the corrosion kinetic parameters and to obtain the equivalent circuit models and parameters for interfacial reactions. The XRD, SEM and EDS tests were conducted to analyze the composition and characteristics of the corrosion products.

EXPERIMENTAL

A three-electrode electrochemical system was employed for the experiments. The test samples were industrial PCB-Cu specimens (copper content > 99.5%) with dimensions of 20×3.5×0.035 mm, which electroplating temperature was 25°C and current density was 3 A dm–2. Two identical PCB-Cu samples were used as the working electrode (WE) and the counter electrode (CE) respectively, with an electrode spacing of 0.5 mm. A 2-mm diameter hole was drilled at a position 0.5 mm away from both the working and counter electrodes, through which a salt bridge connected the electrodes to the electrolyte solution. Copper wires were welded to the electrodes for electrochemical measurements, and the weld points were sealed with silicone rubber. A saturated calomel electrode served as the reference electrode (RE).
The electrolyte solutions used in the tests were 0.01 M, 0.1 M, and 0.5 M Na2SO4 solutions which were prepared by analytical grade reagents and deionized water. Electrochemical testing was conducted using a CHI660C electrochemical workstation. The potential scan rate was set at 60 mV min–1, and the frequency range for electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was from 50 mHz to 100 kHz.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Polarization Curves

Fig. 1 shows the polarization curves of PCB-Cu after exposure to different SO42– concentrations for 2 hours at a temperature of 25°C and relative humidity of 60%. The cathodic polarization curve consists of two regions, I and II. Region I is a weak polarization area near the open-circuit potential where oxygen reduction occurs. Region II represents the limiting diffusion zone of oxygen, where both oxygen and corrosion products undergo reduction.
Based on the cathodic polarization curves shown in Fig. 1, the values of the cathodic current density at – 0.24 V (SCE) for PCB-Cu exposed to different SO42– concentrations for 2 hours were presented in Table 1. The cathodic current density of PCB-Cu improved with the increasing of SO42– concentration. This improvement was due to the effects of the adsorbed liquid film thickness and corrosion products. Na2SO4 has a tendency to absorb H2O from the air, leading to the deliquescence.
Therefore, under constant environmental relative humidity, the increasing of SO42– concentration facilitated the thickening of the liquid film on the surface of PCB-Cu. This condition promoted the formation of soluble sulfates such as NaCu2(SO4)2OH, Cu4SO4(OH)6 and CuSO4. As shown in Fig. 2a, the corrosion products on the sample after electrochemical testing mainly adhere to the surface in a flocculent manner. EDS test results indicate that the main chemical elements of the corrosion products were C, O, Na, Cu, and S. The XRD result (Fig. 2b) indicated that the corrosion products mainly included Cu4SO4(OH)6·H2O and CuSO4. The presence of these corrosion products expanded the effective area for oxygen reduction on the electrode surface, thereby enhancing the cathodic current density [10]. Fig. 3 shows the SEM and EDS test results of the PCB-Cu under SO2 atmosphere with different humidity. The corrosion products of the samples were also showing a flocculent manner and denser. The EDS results show that the corrosion products were consist of C, O, S and Cu. Except of Na which was induced by NaSO4 solution, the main chemical elements of the corrosion products of the samples in SO2 atmosphere and after electrochemical test were same.

Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS)

Fig. 4 and 5 illustrate the impedance changes of PCB-Cu after exposure to varying concentrations of SO42– for 2 hours, with Fig. 4 displaying the Nyquist impedance spectra and Fig. 5 showing the Bode impedance spectra. As shown in Fig. 4, two capacitive arcs were observed at SO42– concentrations of 0.01 mol L–1 and 0.1 mol L–1. The high-frequency capacitive arc corresponds to the capacitance and resistance of the film formed on the PCB-Cu surface, which includes the oxide layer and corrosion products of copper [11]. The low-frequency capacitive arc was because of the double-layer capacitance and charge transfer resistance [12]. At the SO42– concentration increasing to 0.5 mol L–1, only one capacitive arc is visible, indicating that the corrosion process is predominantly controlled by the charge transfer resistance. And the center of the capacitive arc deviates from the real axis, suggesting a dispersion effect.
The Bode plot in Fig. 5 indicates the uniformity of current distribution. When the SO42– concentration was 0.01 mol L–1, the phase angle remained above –45o, implying a uniform current distribution over the working electrode surface in the low-frequency region. However, with the SO42– concentration increased to 0.1 mol L–1 and 0.5 mol L–1, the phase angle fell below –45o, indicating that higher SO42– concentration reduced the uniformity of current distribution on the PCB-Cu surface.
Fig. 6 provided a schematic diagram of the equivalent circuit for PCB-Cu under thin liquid film, in which Rs represents the solution resistance, CEP represents the constant phase angle element of the liquid film, Rf is the film resistance, CPEdl represents the double-layer capacitance associated with the charge transfer resistance, and Rct represents the charge transfer resistance.
The EIS fitting results obtained under different SO42– concentrations are shown in Table 2. Rs represents the solution resistance, which gradually decreased from 9 Ωcm2 to nearly 0 with increasing of the SO42– concentration. n2 represents the dispersion coefficient, and the greater the value of n, the less the dispersion effect. Rct is the charge transfer resistance, indicating the resistance encountered by the charge transfer during the electrode process, and its reciprocal can characterize the corrosion rate of PCB-Cu under varying conditions. When the SO42–-concentrations were 0.01, 0.1 and 0.5 mol L–1, the corresponding corrosion rates of PCB-Cu were 6.76×10–5 Ω–1cm–2, 12.36×10–5 Ω–1cm–2 and 16.05×10–5 Ω–1cm–2, respectively. During the early stages of corrosion (after exposure for 2 hours), the increasing of SO42– concentration made PCBCu more susceptible to corrosion, significantly accelerating the corrosion rate, which is consistent with the change in the cathodic current density in the polarization curves. The increasing of SO42– concentration accelerated the adsorption of water vapor from the atmosphere, leading to an increased thickness of the liquid film on the surface of PCB-Cu. Additionally, the formation of soluble sulfates on the PCB-Cu surface due to high concentrations of SO42– also expedites the corrosion of PCB-Cu [13].
At a temperature of 25°C and relative humidity of 60%, the impedance changes of PCB-Cu over exposure time under different concentrations of SO42– are shown in Fig. 7 to 9. In the Nyquist impedance spectra, the radius of the capacitive arcs noticeably decreases with increasing exposure time across all SO42–-concentrations, indicating that the corrosive medium more easily penetrated through the layer of corrosion products to react with the substrate surface, thereby reducing the corrosion resistance of the corrosion products. Compared to the Rct, the value of the Rs is smaller, suggesting that despite the very thin thickness of the adsorbed liquid film, the ohmic drop between the working electrode and the reference electrode was relatively small.
As shown in Fig. 10, 1/Rct can characterize the corrosion rate of PCB-Cu under different conditions. In the initial stage of corrosion (exposure for 2 hours), fewer corrosion products generated, and the primary influencing factor of the corrosion process is the cathodic reduction process. The increase of SO42– concentration enhanced the cathodic current density, thus increasing the corrosion rate of PCB-Cu. As exposure time increased, corrosion products continuously accumulated on the surface of PCB-Cu, significantly affecting the corrosion process. Fig. 8 shows that the corrosion rate of PCB-Cu in different SO42– concentrations exhibits a steady growth trend throughout the entire corrosion period. This indicates that the corrosion products formed on PCB-Cu in Na2SO4 solution have a porous structure, offering poor protection against corrosion of the PCB-Cu substrate.
The reducible corrosion products participate in the corrosion reaction and accelerate the further dissolution of the substrate, which also increased the corrosion rate. Notably, when the exposure time reached to 72 hours, the corrosion rate at an SO42– concentration of 0.01 mol L–1 markedly increased, while at 0.5 mol L–1 SO42–, the corrosion rate tend to stabilize. This phenomenon may be related to the morphology, distribution, and composition of the corrosion products under different SO42– concentrations. As shown in Fig. 11, the thickness of the corrosion products of the 24h-tested sample was obviously more than which of the 2 h-tested sample. While the thickness of the corrosion products did not increase significantly after 24-hour test. Especially for the sample tested with high sulfate concentration, which had a high corrosion rate, the fast generation of the corrosion products would effectively reduce the contact between the corrosive medium and the metal surface and obstruct the diffusion paths of corrosive ions, thereby stabilizing the corrosion rate. After prolonged exposure, the layer of corrosion products accumulated on the surface of PCB-Cu at high SO42– concentrations might inhibited the diffusion of reactive substances, thereby suppressing the increase of the corrosion rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Under thin film conditions, the corrosion process of PCB-Cu is primarily controlled by oxygen and the reduction of corrosion products, with the improvement of cathodic current density as the concentration of SO42– increased. Electrochemical impedance tests show that during the initial stage of corrosion, the main factor affecting the corrosion rate of PCB-Cu was the cathodic reduction process, and the corrosion rate improved with the increase of SO42– concentration. However, as the reaction continued, toward the later stages of corrosion, the accumulation of surface corrosion products inhibited the corrosion rate of PCB-Cu.

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The study was supported by Class C Research Grant at CVC Testing Technology Co Ltd.

Fig. 1.
The polarization curves of PCB-Cu after being exposed to different SO42– concentrations for 2 hours.
jecst-2025-00136f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
(a) SEM, EDS results and (b) XRD test result of the corrosion products.
jecst-2025-00136f2.jpg
Fig. 3.
SEM and EDS test results of the PCB-Cu under SO2 atmosphere with different humidity: (a) 80%, (b) 85%, (c) 90%.
jecst-2025-00136f3.jpg
Fig. 4.
Nyquist impedance spectrum of PCB-Cu after exposure to different concentrations of SO42– for 2 hours.
jecst-2025-00136f4.jpg
Fig. 5.
Bode impedance spectrum of PCB-Cu after exposure to different concentrations of SO42– for 2 hours.
jecst-2025-00136f5.jpg
Fig. 6.
Schematic diagram of the equivalent circuit for PCB-Cu under thin liquid film.
jecst-2025-00136f6.jpg
Fig. 7.
The Nyquist and Bode impedance spectra of PCB-Cu under a SO42– concentration of 0.01 mol L–1 and exposure time ranging from 2 to 72 h.
jecst-2025-00136f7.jpg
Fig. 8.
The Nyquist and Bode impedance spectra of PCB-Cu under a SO42– concentration of 0.1 mol/L and exposure time ranging from 2 to 72 h.
jecst-2025-00136f8.jpg
Fig. 9.
The Nyquist and Bode impedance spectra of PCB-Cu under a SO42– concentration of 0.5 mol L–1 and exposure time ranging from 2 to 72 h.
jecst-2025-00136f9.jpg
Fig. 10.
The corrosion rate of PCB-Cu at different SO42– concentrations and exposure times.
jecst-2025-00136f10.jpg
Fig. 11.
The SEM results of the corrosion products with different test time: (a) 2 h, (b) 24 h, (c) 48 h, (d) 72 h.
jecst-2025-00136f11.jpg
Table 1.
Cathodic current density at –0.24V (SCE) for PCB-Cu after exposure to different SO42– concentrations for 2 h
Relative humidity Temperature SO42– concentration Cathodic current density
60% 25°C 0.01 mol L–1 197 μA cm–2
0.1 mol L–1 297 μA cm–2
0.5 mol L–1 321 μA cm–2
Table 2.
EIS fitting results for PCB-Cu after exposure to different SO42– concentrations for 2 h
SO42 (mol L–1) Rf (Ω cm2) CEP-dl (F cm–2 Hz1–n) n2 Rct (Ω cm2)
0.01 179 5.27E-5 0.61 14802
0.1 34 1.02E-5 0.78 8090
0.5 10 2.34E-5 0.77 6229

REFERENCES

[1] S. Bahrebar and R. Ambat, J. Electron. Mater., 2022, 51, 4388–4406.
crossref pdf
[2] K. Piotrowska, R. U. Din, F. B. Grumsen, M. S. Jellesen and R. Ambat, J. Electron. Mater., 2018, 47(7), 4190–4207.
crossref pdf
[3] S. Jiang, B. Liao, Z. Chen and X. Guo, Int. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2018, 13(10), 9942–9949.
crossref
[4] X. He, M. Azarian and M. G. Pecht, J. Electron. Mater., 2011, 40(9), 1921–1936.
crossref pdf
[5] W. S. Hong and C. Oh, J. Electron. Mater., 2020, 49(1), 48–58.
crossref pdf
[6] B. Liao, H. Wang, S. Wan, W. Xiao and X. Guo, Metals, 2020, 10(7), 942.
crossref
[7] K. Ding, X. Li, K. Xiao, C. Dong, K. Zhang and R. Zhao, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 2015, 25(7), 2446–2457.
crossref
[8] M. S. Hong and J. G. Kim, J. Electron. Mater., 2019, 48(8), 5012–5017.
crossref pdf
[9] V. Verdingovas, M. S. Jellesen and R. Ambat, Microelectron. Reliab., 2017, 73, 158–166.
crossref
[10] H. Huang, X. Guo, G. Zhang and Z. Dong, Corros. Sci., 2011, 53(5), 1700–1707.
crossref
[11] X. Zhong, J. Mater. Sci-Mater. El, 2020, 31(11), 8996–9005.
crossref pdf
[12] X. Zhong, W. Lu, B. Liao, B. Medgyes, J. Hu, Y. Zheng, D. Zeng and Z. Zhang, Corros. Sci., 2019, 156, 10–15.
crossref
[13] H. Huang, X. Guo, G. Zhang and Z. Dong, Corros. Sci., 2011, 53(5), 1700–1707.
crossref


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
E-mail: journal@kecs.or.kr    Tel: +82-2-568-9392    Fax: +82-2-568-5931                   

Copyright © 2025 by The Korean Electrochemical Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next