J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol Search

CLOSE


J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol > Volume 17(1); 2026 > Article
Cho, Kim, One, Lee, Choi, Choi, Kang, and Son: The Enhancement of Electrochemical Properties of Yttrium-Doped Single-Crystal Cathode Materials for High-Rate Charging and Discharging

Abstract

Single-crystal cathode materials typically restrict lithium-ion (Li-ion) diffusion, which cause lower capacity and rate performance than those of traditional polycrystalline cathodes. Enhancing Li-ion transport is crucial for improving their electrochemical properties. This study investigates the effect of yttrium (Y) doping on improving Li-ion diffusion and electrochemical performance of single-crystal cathode materials. Y-doped single-crystal cathodes were synthesized and characterized. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy was used to measure charge transfer resistance before and after cycling. Li-ion diffusion coefficients were calculated. Rate capability and capacity retention were evaluated through charge/discharge tests at various C-rates. Y-doped samples exhibited a significant decrease in charge transfer resistance from 25.1–7.3 Ω before cycling and from 72.4–19.2 Ω after cycling which reflected a reduction of approximately 70%. The Li-ion diffusion coefficient improved by 1.5 times, thereby reaching 2.85×10–13 cm2/s. Capacity retention at a rate of 5C was 76.5%, with a discharge capacity of 140.67 mAhg–1 than that of the initial capacity at 0.1 C. After high-rate cycling, the recovery capacity at 0.1 C recovered to 179.4 mAhg–1, which indicated 97.4% reversibility.

INTRODUCTION

Polycrystalline nickel (Ni)-rich cathode materials face challenges including surface reconstruction, transition metal dissolution, and interparticle cracking during charge–discharge cycles, which degrade battery performance [13].
To address these issues, researchers have focused on single-crystal cathode materials by aligning grain boundaries into single particles to improve structural stability [46]. However, single crystallization lengthens lithium-ion (Li-ion) diffusion paths, which results in slow diffusion rates and poor rate performance than their polycrystalline counterparts [7,8]. Doping elements into polycrystalline cathodes is an extensively accepted strategy used to enhance both structural and electrochemical properties [915].
In this study, doping was employed to improve the electrochemical performance of Ni-rich single-crystal cathodes. Specifically, yttrium (Y) was introduced during the synthesis of single-crystal LiNi0.78Mn0.2Y0.02O2. Y has a higher binding energy with oxygen (−1816.65 kJ/mol) compared to Ni (−211.7 kJ/mol) and manganese (Mn) (−465.1 kJ/mol), which enable it to substitute transition metals in the transition metal (TM) layer [16]. This substitution improves structural stability, expands the lithium pathway, enhances the ionic conductivity, and ultimately boosts the battery's high-rate performance [1718].

EXPERIMENTAL

Precursor Synthesis

Based on previous studies, the coprecipitation method was used to synthesize the Ni0.8Mn0.2(OH)2 precursor [19,20]. The raw materials, NiSO4·6H2O(98.5–102%, SAMCHUN) and MnSO4·H2O(98.0%, SAMCHUN), were dissolved in distilled water. Co-precipitation was conducted in a 10 L reactor using NaOH solution(30%, SAMCHUN) and NH4OH solution(25–30%, SAMCHUN) while maintaining a pH of 11–12, a temperature of 55°C, and a stirring speed of 1000 rpm for 8 h. After filtration, the precursor was washed with distilled water to remove NH4+ and SO42- impurities, then dried at 120°C in a vacuum oven for 24 h.

Cathode Material Synthesis

To synthesize single-crystal Y-doped LiNi0.78Mn0.02O2 (SC-NMY), the precursor was mixed with excess LiOH·H2O (99.9%, Aldrich) and C6H9O6Y (99.9%, Aldrich). The mixture was calcined in an oxygen atmosphere, with the temperature ramped at 3°C/min to 500°C (held for 6 h), and then to 880°C (held for 12 h). After ball milling and sieving, the final product was LiNi0.78Mn0.2Y0.02O2 (SC-NMY). The bare material (SC-NM82) was synthesized by mixing the precursor with LiOH·H2O and subjecting it to the same heat treatment, milling, and sieving steps.

Material Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD, D2 Phaser, Bruker) was used to analyze the crystalline structure between 10° and 80° at a scan rate of 3°/min using Cu radiation. The surface morphologies and elemental distributions of the synthesized samples were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL JSM-7610F) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) mapping.

Electrode Preparation and Electro chemical Evaluation

The electrodes were prepared as following previous studies.[20] A slurry of cathode material, Super P, and PVDF in an 8:1:1 weight ratio was mixed with N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) and coated onto 15 μm aluminum (Al) foil using a doctor blade, achieving a thickness of 25 μm. After drying at 120°C in a vacuum oven, the electrodes were roll-pressed and punched into discs.
Coin cells (CR2032) were assembled using Li metal as the anode, polypropylene (PP) as the separator, and 1 M LiPF6 in EC/DEC (3:7 by volume) as the electrolyte. All assemblies were prepared in an Ar-filled glovebox. Galvanostatic charge–discharge tests (3.0–4.3 V) were conducted at 25°C using a PNE cycler. Rate performance was evaluated at 0.1 C, 0.2 C, 0.5 C, 1 C, 2 C, and 5 C. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was performed using an IviumStat instrument (HS Technology).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The synthesized precursor Ni0.8Mn0.2(OH)2 was combined with LiOH·H2O and dopant C6H9O6Y for the solid-state synthesis of SC-NMY. XRD analysis (Fig. 1) showed that both SC-NM82 and SC-NMY possess layered structures corresponding to the R-3m space group (α-NaFeO2-type). Y substitution in the TM layer increased the c-axis length and shifted the I(003) peak to a lower angle, thereby indicating lattice expansion [5,6].
SEM and EDS mapping (Fig. 2) revealed that SC-NMY and SC-NM82 formed single-crystal particles of 2–3 μm [16,22]. The grain boundaries of the particles appear to be well-aligned indicating a single-crystalline morphology of the particles [2123]. Elemental mapping confirmed the uniform distributions of Ni, Mn, and Y.
Initial charge-discharge profiles at 0.1 C (Fig. 3, Table 2) showed that SC-NMY had a higher initial discharge capacity (181.9 mAhg–1) and coulombic efficiency (89%) than SC-NM82 (157.3 mAhg–1, 87%). In addition, the bare material exhibited a steeper voltage increase, whereas SC-NMY showed a more stabilized voltage rise.
This indicates that voltage stabilization occurred in SC-NMY, which is expected to be advantageous for high-rate charge/discharge operations.
The dQ/dV curves (Fig. 4) revealed structural transitions during cycling at the 1st, 30th, 50th cycles: H1 ⇄ M ⇄ H2 ⇄ H3. SC-NMY exhibits sharper redox peaks than SC-NM82, thereby suggesting a more uniform electrochemical reaction. In Fig. 4a, the oxidation during the first cycle of the bare material increased from 3.82 V to 3.89 V, with a broadly distributed oxidation peak. In contrast, SC-NMY showed an oxidation peak rising from 3.80 V to 3.89 V, but the peak was sharper compared to that of the bare material. This suggests that although the voltage increased due to Y doping, the electrochemical reaction occurred more intensively around a specific voltage. Compared to the bare material, the redox reactions in SC-NMY were more uniform and homogeneous [24].
Cycling performance shown in Fig. 5 was measured at 1C with a cut-off voltage range of 3.0 to 4.3 V up to the 100th cycle. SC-NMY exhibited an initial discharge capacity of 163.15 mAhg–1 at the 1st cycle, with a value approximately 20 mAhg–1 higher than that of the bare material (143.5 mAhg–1). After 100 cycles, the bare material delivered a capacity of 127.68 mAhg–1 with a retention of 88.9%, while SC-NMY retained 146.23 mAhg–1, corresponding to a retention of 89.6%. The minor difference in capacity retention was attributed to the structural stability of the single-crystalline cathode material, which is one of its key advantages. Based on this observation, a C-rate performance test was subsequently conducted.
C-rate performance (Fig. 6) applied current densities were set in the following order: 0.1 C (17mAhg–1), 0.2 C (34mAhg–1), 0.5 C (85 m Ah g–1), 1 C (170 mAhg–1), 2 C (340 mAhg–1), 5 C (850 mAhg–1) and finally back to 0.1C (17 mAhg–1) [19]. The capacity retention results are shown in Table 3. The bare material showed an initial capacity of 169.59 mAhg–1 at 0.1 C, and retained 120.68 mAhg–1 at the high rate of 5C, corresponding to an efficiency of 71.5%. In contrast, SC-NMY exhibited a discharge capacity of 183.90 mAhg–1 at 0.1 C, and retained 140.67 mAh g–1 at 5C, achieving an efficiency of 76.5%, with a value roughly 5% higher than that of the bare material. When the current density was returned to the low rate of 0.1 C, the doped SC-NMY delivered a capacity of 179.40 mAhg–1, showing a reversibility of 97.4%, which is approximately 11% higher than that of the bare material (146.53 mAhg–1). This improvement is attributed to the enhanced Li-ion diffusion during charge/discharge, which is a result of the expanded Li-ion pathway caused by Y substitution in the transition metal (TM) layer, as also observed in the XRD results [21]. Moreover, the substitution of Y in the TM layer contributed to structural stabilization due to its high binding energy, which led to the observed high capacity reversibility [23].
EIS results (Fig. 7, Table 4) showed that SC-NMY had significantly lower charge transfer resistance before (7.3 Ω) and after cycling (19.2 Ω) than that of SC-NM82 (25.1 Ω and 72.4 Ω, respectively). Moreover, the Li-ion diffusion coefficient of SC-NMY (2.85×10–13 cm²/s) was 1.5× higher than that of SC-NM82 (1.92×10–13 cm²/s), which is attributed to the expanded Li pathways from Y substitution., consistent with the c-axis expansion in the XRD.

CONCLUSIONS

This study synthesized Y-doped single-crystal LiNi0.78Mn0.2Y0.02O2 to address low lithium-ion diffusivity in single-crystal cathodes. Y, with its high oxygen binding energy, was successfully substituted into the TM layer. XRD analysis confirmed c-axis expansion(14.225→14.231 Å), indicating the expansion of the Li-ion pathway, and EIS and rate performance data validated enhanced ionic conductivity and structural stability. SC-NMY demonstrated a 3-fold reduction in charge transfer resistance, with Rct values decreasing from 25.1 Ω to 7.3 Ω before cycling and from 72.4 Ω to 19.2 Ω after 100 cycles, compared to the bare material. In addition, lithium-ion diffusivity improved from 1.92 × 10–13 cm²/s to 2.85 × 10–13 cm²/s, representing a 1.5× enhancement. During the C-rate test, this improvement in Li ion diffusivity contributed to superior high-rate performance, with SC-NMY showing 76.5% efficiency at 5 C, compared to 71% for the bare material. Furthermore, in the recovery test following high-rate cycling, SC-NMY delivered a discharge capacity of 179.4 mAhg–1, corresponding to 97.4% reversibility, which is approximately 11% higher than that of the bare material. These results confirm that doping with Y, which has a high binding energy with oxygen, is a promising strategy to enhance both diffusivity and structural stability in single-crystal cathode materials.

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was supported by the Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) grant funded by the Korea Government (MOTIE) (RS-2022-KI002562, HRD Program for Industrial Innovation), and by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) and the Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) through the “Support for Middle Market Enterprises and Regional Innovation Alliances (R&D, RS-2025-02633071)” program.

Fig. 1.
XRD patterns of SC-NM82 and SC-NMY.
jecst-2025-00619f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
SEM and EDS images of (a) SC-NMY, (b) SC-NM82, element distribution of SC-NMY (c)Ni, (d) Mn, (e) Y.
jecst-2025-00619f2.jpg
Fig. 3.
Initial charge-discharge curves SC-NM82 and SC-NMYcathodes with 0.1 C current at the range of 3.0–4.3 V.
jecst-2025-00619f3.jpg
Fig. 4.
The dQ/dV curves for a) SC-NM82 and b) SC-NMY cathodes at various cycles with 1 C current at the range of 3.0–4.3 V.
jecst-2025-00619f4.jpg
Fig. 5.
Cycling performance of SC-NM82 and SC-NMY cathodes with 1C current at the range of 3.0–4.3 V.
jecst-2025-00619f5.jpg
Fig. 6.
Rate capability curves of SC-NM82 and SC-NMY cathodes in the voltage range.
jecst-2025-00619f6.jpg
Fig. 7.
a) Equivalent circuit model used to fit the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data of the cell. EIS spectra of SC-NM82 and SC-NMY measured at 25°C b) before and c) after 100th cycling.
jecst-2025-00619f7.jpg
Table 1.
Lattice parameters of SC-NM82 and SC-NMY.
Sample Lattice parameter
Cell volume (Å) I(003)/I(104) R-factor
a (Å) c (Å)
SC-NM82 2.874 (±0.0000) 14.225 (±0.0001) 101.729 (±0.0018) 1.68 0.4868
SC-NMY 2.874 (±0.0000) 14.231 (±0.0000) 101.788 (±0.0000) 1.65 0.4920
Table 2.
Initial charge-discharge efficiency of SC-NM82 and SC-NMY.
Initial charge Initial discharge Coulombic efficiency
SC-NM82 179.06 157.34 87%
SC-NMY 202.58 181.9 89%
Table 3.
Rate capability efficiency of SC-NM82 and SC-NMY cathode.
0.1C 0.2C 0.5C 1C 2C 5C 0.1C
SC-NM82 100 97.6 92.7 87.2 80.6 71.5 86.4
SC-NMY 100 97.4 94.2 89.3 83.0 76.5 97.4
Table 4.
EIS and Li-ion diffusion of SC-NM82 and SC-NMY cathode.
SC-NM82 SC-NMY Rate of change (%)
Temperature 25°C
Charge transfer Resistance 25.1 Ω 7.3 Ω -71%
SEI Resistance after 100 cycles 16.5 Ω 8.7 Ω -48%
Charge transfer Resistance after 100 cycles 72.4 Ω 19.2 Ω -73%
Li-ion diffusion (cm²/s) 1.92×10–13 2.85×10–13 +48%

REFERENCES

[1] H. Yu, Y. Cao, L. Chen, Y. Hu, X. Duan, S. Dai, C. Li and H. Jiang, Nat. Commun., 2021, 12, 4564.

[2] X. B. Kong, Y. G. Zhang, J. Y. Li, H. Y. Yang, P. P. Dai, J. Zeng and J. B. Zhao, Chem. Eng. J., 2022, 434, 134638.
crossref
[3] J.-Y. Wang, S.-N. Guo, X. Wang, L. Gu and D. Su, J. Electrochem., 2022, 28(2), 210843.

[4] X. Tan, W. Peng, M. Wang, G. Luo, Z. Wang, G. Yan, H. Guo, Q. Li and J. Wang, Prog. Nat. Sci-Mater., 2023, 33(1), 108–115.
crossref
[5] H. G. Xie, H. R. Peng, D. T. Jiang, Z. Xiao, X. P. Liu, H. Liang, M. L. Wu, D. M. Liu, Y. L. Sun, S. K. Zhong, Z. F. Qian and R. H. Wang, Chem. Eng. J., 2023, 470, 144051.
crossref
[6] J. Zhang, T. Z. Cao, Y. Lei, J. Y. Li, W. F. Fan, B. Zhang, X. Y. Liu, Y. J. Si and H. H. Wang, J. Alloy. Compd., 2023, 957, 170400.
crossref
[7] Y. K. Han, Y. K. Lei, J. Ni, Y. C. Zhang, Z. Geng, P. W. Ming, C. M. Zhang, X. R. Tian, J. L. Shi, Y. G. Guo and Q. F. Xiao, Small, 2022, 18(43), 2107048.

[8] X. Zhu, H. Yu, L. Cheng, F. xu, Z. Wang and L.-Z. Fan, J. Materiomics, 2023, 9(1), 82–89.
crossref
[9] R. Zhang, C. Wang, P. Zou, R. Lin, L. Ma, L. Yin, T. Li, W. Xu, H. Jia and Q. Li, Nature, 2022, 610, 67–73.
crossref pdf
[10] J. X. Shen, B. Zhang, X. Y. He, B. B. Xiao, Z. M. Xiao, X. Li and X. Ou, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2023, 629(A), 388–398.
crossref
[11] J. X. Shen, D. Deng, X. Li, B. Zhang, Z. Xiao, C. Hu, X. Yan and X. Ou, J. Alloy. Compd., 2022, 903, 163999.
crossref
[12] Y. Y. Li, C. C. Wan, Y. N. Tian, J. Z. Li, C. S. Yang, W. Zhang, X. X. Zhang, Z. X. Hao, Z. H. Yang, P. M. Gu, B. Yang, D. B. Ruan, M. Xie and J. Hu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2023, 609, 155162.
crossref
[13] U. H. Kim, S. B. Lee, J. H. Ryu, C. S. Yoon and Y. K. Sun, J. Power Sources, 2023, 564, 232850.
crossref
[14] P. F. Zhang, Z. F. Liu, B. Ma, P. Li, Y. K. Zhou and X. H. Tian, Ceram. Int., 2021, 47(23), 33843–33852.
crossref
[15] H. Wu, X. Zhou, C. Yang, D. W. Xu, Y. H. Zhu, T. F. Zhou, S. Xin and Y. You, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2023, 15(15), 18828–18835.
crossref pdf
[16] N. Li, R. An, Y. Su, F. Wu, L. Bao, L. Chen, Y. Zheng, H. Shou and S. Chen, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2013, 1(34), 9760–9767.
crossref
[17] J.-H. Hwang, H.-W. Shin and T.-W. Hong, J. Hydrogen New Energy, 2022, 33(1), 8–18.
crossref
[18] T. T. B. Tran, E. J. Park, H. I. Kim, S. H. Lee, H. J. Jang and J. T. Son, Mater. Lett., 2022, 316, 131810.

[19] H. J. Jeon, S. A. Monim, C. S. Kang and J. T. Son, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 2013, 74(9), 1185–1195.
crossref
[20] G. W. Yoo, H. J. Jeon and J. T. Son, J. Korean Electrochem. Soc., 2013, 16(2), 59–64.
crossref
[21] J. Shen, B. Zhang, C. Hao, X. Li, Z. Xiao, X. He and X. Ou, GEE, 2024, 9(6), 1045–1057.
crossref
[22] H. Feng, Y. Xu, Y. Zhou, J. Song, J. Yang and Q. Tan, J. Alloy. Compd., 2024, 976, 173043.
crossref
[23] W. Zheng, H. Wang, S. Lu and H. He, ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2023, 6(18), 9487–9498.
crossref pdf
[24] B. Zhang, C. Zheng, Z. Xiao, K. Xian, H. Wen, N. Lu, X. He, L. Ye, J. Wang, X. Ou and C. Wang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2025, 684, 161839.
crossref


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
E-mail: journal@kecs.or.kr    Tel: +82-2-568-9392               

Copyright © 2026 by The Korean Electrochemical Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next