J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol Search

CLOSE


J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol > Epub ahead of print
Kang, Ji, Zhang, Zeng, Guo, Bing-Xu, and Lin: High Performances Aqueous Nickel-bismuth Batteries Assembled with Highly Crystalline Bi2O3 and CoNi-CoNiO2@NiCo Layered Double Hydroxides Heterostructure Nanoarrays

Abstract

Bi2O3 as prospective anode active materials for aqueous rechargeable nickel-bismuth batteries, is confronted with limited capacity and cycling durability. Herein, highly crystalline Bi2O3 with a tousled, cookie-like microstructure was synthesized by calcining Bi2O2CO3 precursors. The as-prepared Bi2O3 delivers a remarkable specific capacity of 266.7 mAh/g at 2 A/g and 203.3 mAh/g at 20 A/g, while maintaining 62.6% of its initial capacity after 1900 cycles at 15 A/g. For the cathode, heterostructured nanoarrays consisting of CoNiO2 and Co-Ni alloy cores grown on nickel foam, coated with nickel-cobalt layered double hydroxide shells, exhibit excellent electrochemical performance, with specific capacities of 249.7 mAh/g at 1 A/g and 112.0 mAh/g at 20 A/g. The assembled aqueous nickel-bismuth battery achieves a maximum energy density of 34.8 Wh/kg and a power density of 4400.5 W/kg at 1 A/g. These outstanding energy storage properties are attributed to the synergistic effect of the highly crystalline, tousled Bi2O3 anode and the heterostructured nanoarray cathode.

INTRODUCTION

Aqueous rechargeable nickel-bismuth batteries (ARNBBs) have garnered significant attention due to their intrinsic safety, excellent ionic conductivity, and environmental friendliness [14]. These attributes make them a promising solution for addressing the ongoing energy crisis and mitigating environmental issues [5]. However, the low energy density of ARNBBs is attributed to the narrow electrochemical stability window of aqueous electrolytes (theoretically limited to 1.23 V due to hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions), which also restricts the redox activity of electrode active materials. The structure and composition of electrode active materials play a vital role in enhancing electrochemical properties of ARNBBs [6,7]. To date, the rational design and synthesis of advanced electrode materials remains a central challenge for developing high-performance ARNBBs [4,8]. Among bismuth based anode active materials, Bi2O3 has aroused wide concerns due to the superiorities such as high theoretical capacity (345 mAh/g) [4], 3-electron redox reactions [4,9,10], wide potential range and low toxicity [11]. For instance, the composites of Bi2O3 rods/graphene sheets as anode materials present a capacity of 278 mAh/g at 0.5 A/g, and the corresponding ARNBBs demonstrate cycling durability of about 60% after 200 cycles at 5 C [2]. The anode Bi2O3@C exhibits a capacity of 120 mAh/g at 0.83 A/g with capacity retention of about 40% at 26.67 A/g [1]. Nevertheless, most Bi2O3-based anodes and their corresponding batteries still suffer from unsatisfactory capacity and cycling durability, which can be primarily attributed to their limited active sites, poor electrical conductivity, and structural instability [4,12]. Previous studies have demonstrated that high crystallinity can help accommodate the structural strain induced during repeated electrochemical reactions and enhance the diffusion rate of electrolyte ions [13,14]. The currently dominant synthesis methods for Bi2O3, however, such as hydrothermal and electrodeposition, typically yield materials with low crystallinity. Therefore, developing Bi2O3 anode materials with abundant active sites and high crystallinity presents a viable strategy for improving electrochemical performances [13].
On the other hand, transition metal oxides/hydroxides (i.e., Co3O4 [15], Ni(OH)2 [16]) have become promising cathode active materials on account of their rich oxidation state, high conductivity, low cost and environmental friendliness [1719]. Compared with single metal oxides, complex metal oxides can demonstrate significantly improved electrochemical performances due to the complementarity of various metal elements [2022]. For example, flower-like CoNiO2 microspheres with hierarchical pore structure, demonstrates a specific capacitance of 854.9 and 414.5 F/g at 1 and 20 A/g, respectively, which are superior to single metal oxide NiO and Co3O4 prepared by the same method [23]. Additionally, the capacity and cycling stability of electrode materials can be boosted through heterostructure interfacial engineering, by facilitating ion/electron transport via the built-in electric field and providing buffer spaces to accommodate volume expansion [4,24]. For example, NiCoOX@nickel-cobalt layered double hydroxides (NCLDH) can manifest one superior specific capacitance of 2451 F/g at 1 A/g with rate capability of 62.8% at 20 A/g thanks to its heterogeneous structure [17]. In view of this, a core-shell heterostructure nanoarray (CoNi-CoNiO2@NCLDH) was engineered on nickel foam (NF), featuring a core of CoNiO2 and Co-Ni alloy and an NCLDH shell, to serve as a high-performance cathode.
In this work, highly crystalline Bi2O3 with tousy and ‘cookie’-like micromorphology prepared by calcining Bi2O2CO3 precursors serves as anode materials, and heterostructure nanoarrays of CoNi-CoNiO2@NCLDH are screened as cathode materials to assemble ARNBBs. Bi2O3 anode achieves satisfactory electrochemical properties (specific capacity of 266.7 mAh/g at 2 A/g, rate capability of 76.2% at 20 A/g, and capacity retention of about 62.6% after 1900 cycles at 15 A/g). The cathode CoNi-CoNiO2@NCLDH delivers the specific capacity of 249.7 and 112.0 mAh/g at 1 and 20 A/g, respectively. The corresponding ARNBBs affords the energy density of 34.8 Wh/kg and power density of 691.0 W/kg at 1 A/g. This pork can provide new ideas for designing electrode active materials with superior performances for ARNBBs.

EXPERIMENTAL

Preparation of anode active materials Bi2O3

The preparation procedure of Bi2O3 is illustrated in the scheme 1(a). Bi2O3 was fabricated by annealing Bi2O2CO3 at 500°C for 2 h in air atmosphere. Bi2O2CO3 was synthesized based on the articles published before with some minor modifications [25,26]. The detailed preparation process of Bi2O2CO3 is depicted as follows. Firstly, the reagents of Bi(NO3)3·5H2O (0.97 g), Na3C6H5O7·2H2O (2.01 g), urea (0.48 g) and polyvinylpyrrolidone (1.02 g) were dispersed in turn into the mixed solvents of H2O (60 mL) and C2H6O2 (12 mL). After stirred for 45 min, above reaction liquid was treated at 180°C for 24 h by the solvothermal method. After naturally cooling, Bi2O2CO3 was obtained by rinsing with H2O and drying above precipitates.

Preparation of cathode CoNi-CoNiO2@NCLDH

The synthesis process for cathode CoNi-CoNiO2@NCLDH grown on NF is presented as follows. 1 mmol of Ni(NO3)2·6H2O, 2 mmol of Co(NO3)2·6H2O and 320 mg of hexamethylenetetramine were first dissolved into 70 mL of H2O. Subsequently, the pretreated NF was submerged into the above solution followed by hydrothermal treatment at 90°C for 12 h. After naturally cooling, the NF was treated with sonication and rinsed by distilled water/ethanol. Then, that NF with product was carbonized at 400°C for 1 h in flowing N2 stream to prepare CoNi-CoNiO2 grown on NF, and the mass of CoNi-CoNiO2 is about 0.85 mg/cm2. The NF coated by CoNi-CoNiO2 was immersed into the identical reaction solution as described above followed by hydrothermal treatment at 90°C for 12 h. After cooling, sonication, rinsing and drying, the resulting sample was labeled as CoNi-CoNiO2@NCLDH with the total active materials of 1.72 mg/cm2. The above preparation procedure of cathode can also be observed in the scheme 1(b).

Materials characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) was tested to characterize crystal structure, and elemental composition were characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The micromorphology of electrode active materials was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM).

Electrochemical measurements of single electrodes

Cyclic voltammogram (CV), galvanostatic charge/discharge (GCD), cycling durability and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), were evaluated on the electrochemical working station (CHI 660E) with the three-electrode test system. The three-electrode system mainly consists of platinum sheet as the counter electrode, Hg/HgO electrode with double salt bridge as the reference electrode, and one working electrode, in which 6 M KOH aqueous solution is adopted as the electrolyte. Mixing Bi2O3, acetylene black and polytetrafluoroethylene (with a ratio of 8:1:1 by weight) homogeneously into 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidone with slurry state to fabricate working electrode. Then, the slurry was coated onto NF (1 cm × 1 cm), dried under vacuum at 80°C for 12 h and then pressed under 10 MPa pressure. The average mass loading of Bi2O3 in the anode is about 3.52 mg/cm2.

Assembly and evaluation of ARNBBs

The ARNBBs was assembled with CoNi-CoNiO2@NCLDH grown on NF as the cathode (1 cm × 1 cm), Bi2O3 single electrode as the anode (1 cm × 1 cm), and 6 M KOH aqueous solution as the electrolyte. The two electrodes were pre-activated at a scan rate of 50 mV/s for 100 cycles before assembly. The total active materials mass of ARNBBs is about 3.08 mg. The assembly illustration is demonstrated in the scheme 1(c).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Characterization of Bi2O3

Several characteristic peaks in Fig. 1a correspond well to the standard pattern of Bi2O3 (JCPDS no. 71-2274) [27], indicating that Bi2O3 with high purity and crystallinity can be prepared by annealing Bi2O2CO3. The survey spectrum of XPS in Fig. 1b suggests anode active materials are made up of Bi and O elements. Two peaks with an energy difference of 5.3 eV indicate Bi exists as the valence of +3[23] (Fig. 1c). The fitting peak of O 1s at 529.4, 530.8 and 532.3 eV in Figure 1d can be designated to Bi-O bond, oxygen adsorbed on Bi2O3, together with oxygen in H2O, respectively [12]. The above results indicate Bi2O3 with high purity and crystallinity can be transformed from Bi2O2CO3. Bi2O3 exhibits ‘cookie’-like heterogeneous morphology with locally dense regions embedded in a loosely packed porous matrix as presented in Fig. 2 (a and b), and the structure is not too dense ascribed to the pores in the skeleton and cracks from adjacent skeletons, which contributes to accelerated moving of electrolyte ions and effective utilizing of Bi2O3 [28,29]. The porous structure of Bi2O3 is also verified from TEM images (Fig. 2c). The crystal plane distance of 0.195 nm agrees well with the (041) plane of Bi2O3 in Fig. 2d, and bright diffraction spots further validate the relatively high crystallinity of Bi2O3[30,31].
The CV curves of Bi2O3 all exhibit obvious redox peaks at series of scan rates in Fig. 3a, indicating the Faradic redox reaction occurs [3,32]. When scan rate goes up from 1 mV/s to 10 mV/s, the peak voltage between oxidation/reduction peak increase gradually, which can be put down to the internal resistance and the polarization of Bi2O3 anode [31,33]. Additionally, the shape of redox peaks can be well maintained and peak currents increase gradually with elevating scan rate, manifesting excellent rate capability of Bi2O3 [34]. The b value for Peak1, Peak2 and Peak3 is about 0.6475, 0.5088 and 0.5043, respectively, signifying the diffusion-controlled process mainly dominates electrochemical reactions of Bi2O3 anodes [1,35] (Fig. 3b). The apparent voltage plateau in GCD profiles in Fig. 3c further verifies presence of Faradic redox reaction [3]. The specific capacity shows a fading tendency with elevating current density in Fig. 3d, and Bi2O3 anode delivers the specific capacity of 266.7, 257.6, 250.2, 243.9, 243.5, 235.3, 228.6, 214.6 and 203.3 mAh/g at 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 15 and 20 A/g, respectively. The Bi2O3 anode exhibits a smaller semicircular diameter (Rct = 1.56 Ω) and a lower real-axis intersection (R1 = 0.76 Ω) in the high-frequency region, suggesting low internal resistance [1,31] (Fig. 3e). The Rct and R1 value are lower than that of Bi2MoO6 (Rct = 8.6 Ω and R1 = 0.78 Ω) [31]. Bi2O3 displays about 62.6% capacity retention after 1900 cycles at 15 A/g and nearly 100% coulombic efficiency (Fig. 3f). The above electrochemical results indicate Bi2O3 is one strong anode materials for aqueous energy storage equipment.

Characterization of heterostructure nanoarrays of CoNi-CoNiO2@NCLDH

The crystal structure of cathode active materials was studied by XRD. Fig. 4a shows that the nickel-cobalt layered double hydroxide can be transformed into the composite of CoNi alloy and CoNiO2 after carbonization at 400°C in nitrogen atmosphere. Fig. 4b shows that NCLDH is successfully grown on the surface of CoNi-CoNiO2. Fig. 4c demonstrates the presence of Ni, Co and O elements on the surface. In Fig. 4d, the peaks at 775.2 eV and 796 eV go well with Co0 [36], the peaks at 782 eV and 798.2 eV are designated to Co2+ [37,38], the peaks at 780.9 eV and 797 eV are apportioned to Co3+ [30,39], and the two peaks at 786.4 eV and 802.8 eV belong to satellite peaks [40]. Similarly, as demonstrated in Fig. 4e, the peaks at 854.8 eV and 872.8 eV belong to Ni0 [41], the peaks at 855.8 eV and 873.9 eV are concerned with Ni2+ [38,42], the peaks at 856.8 eV and 877.1 eV are in line with Ni3+ [38,43], and the two peaks at 880.2 eV and 861.9 eV are satellite peaks [38]. As shown in Fig. 4f, the O 1s high-resolution spectrum can be fitted into three peaks. The peaks at 531.0 eV (O1), 531.7 eV (O2) and 532.5 eV (O3) represent metal-oxygen bonds, OH- and multiple physically/chemically adsorbed H2O on or near the surface of the materials, respectively [38,44]. The above test results suggest that the cathode active materials CoNi-CoNiO2@NCLDH are successfully prepared.
As observed in Supplementary Fig. 1(a~c), the NF is completely covered by grass-like CoNi-CoNiO2, which is assembled with crossed nanosheets. The TEM images in Supplementary Fig. 1(d~e) further confirms the lamellar structure of CoNi-CoNiO2, and plenty of pores are distributed on the nanosheets. The HRTEM images in Supplementary Fig. 1f exhibit the interplanar spacing of 0.21, 0.24 and 0.20 nm, which can be designated to the (200) and (111) crystal plane of CoNiO2 and (111) crystal plane of CoNi alloy, respectively [44,45]. The images in Fig. 5 present microstructure of cathode active material CoNi-CoNiO2@NCLDH. The micromorphology of CoNi-CoNiO2@ NCLDH is similar to that of CoNi-CoNiO2, but the arrangement of nanosheets is more disordered than CoNi-CoNiO2 (Fig. 5(a~d)). TEM image in Fig. 5e further verifies the lamellar structure of CoNi-CoNiO2@NCLDH, indicating that NCLDH also presents a lamellar structure when grown on the thin CoNi-CoNiO2 substrate. A crystal plane interval of 0.27 nm in HRTEM image in Fig. 5f is delegated to the (101) crystal plane of NCLDH.
CV curves of CoNi-CoNiO2 are shown in Supplementary Fig. 2a. Clear and distinguishable redox peaks indicate Faradic redox reaction occurs of CoNi-CoNiO2 [38]. Even at 100 mV/s, CV curves can maintain well the initial shapes, indicating the admirable rate capability of CoNi-CoNiO2 [34]. Supplementary Fig. 2b shows an obvious charge/discharge voltage platform in GCD profiles of CoNi-CoNiO2. With enlarging current density, voltage platform in discharge curves moves to the low potential direction step by step. The specific discharge capacity of CoNi-CoNiO2 is 62.2, 60.0, 58.5, 57.3, 56.3, 55.2, 53.6, 51.9, 49.2 and 46.7 mAh/g at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 15 and 20 A/g, respectively, and the rate capability is 75.0% during 1~20 A/g. The above electrochemical test results show that CoNi-CoNiO2 can be used as one promising skeleton materials to further grow active materials NCLDH. The CV curves of CoNi-CoNiO2@NCLDH in Fig. 6a possess obvious redox peaks, indicating Faradic redox reaction occurs to store energy [32,33]. As the scan rate goes up, the oxidation/reduction peak shift to ends of the potential window, which is caused by the internal resistance of active materials and polarization during electrochemical reactions. Moreover, with promoting scan rate, the peak current of oxidation peak together with reduction peak gradually increases, and the shape of CV curve is well kept, indicating that CoNi-CoNiO2@NCLDH has admirable rate capability [34]. The calculated b value is b1=0.561 for anodic peak and b2=0.603 for cathodic peak, indicating that energy storage behavior of CoNi-CoNiO2@NCLDH is both affected by the diffusion process and surface capacitive effect [32]. Fig. 6c depicts GCD curves of CoNi-CoNiO2@NCLDH. The obvious charge/discharge voltage platforms further affirm occurrence of Faraday redox reaction. With enlarging current density, the platform in discharge profile gradually moves to lower potential. As shown in Fig. 6d, the specific discharge capacity is 249.7, 241.5, 234.9, 228.4, 220.4, 211.4, 192.0, 173.8, 136.4 and 112.0 mAh/g at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 15 and 20 A/g, respectively. The rate capability is 44.9% in 1~20 A/g. The specific capacity retention of CoNi-CoNiO2@NCLDH is about 71.8% after 2000 cycles at 20 A/g (Fig. 6e). Fig. 6f shows the EIS diagram of CoNi-CoNiO2 and CoNi-CoNiO2@NCLDH. The lower intersection point on the X-axis indicates that CoNi-CoNiO2@NCLDH has better conductivity as cathode active materials [25,31].

Electrochemical performances of ARNBBs

The ARNBBs were assembled with heterostructure nanoarrays of CoNi-CoNiO2@NCLDH grown on NF as the cathode, single Bi2O3 electrode as the anode together with electrolyte of 6 M KOH aqueous solution. The CV profiles of single electrodes at 5 mV/s both present obvious redox peak within their individual potential window in Fig. 7a. As demonstrated in Fig. 7b, apparent redox peaks appear in the potential window (0~1.6 V) [12]. As scan rate goes up to 20 mV/s, CV curves together with redox peaks can keep the similar shape. The GCD curves also display charge/discharge voltage plateaus in Fig. 7c and d. The specific capacity of ARNBBs decreases by degrees as current density goes up (Fig. 7e). The specific capacity is 50.4, 42.8, 38.0, 34.4, 31.5, 29.2, 25.3 and 21.9 mAh/g at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10 A/g, respectively, also exhibiting the decaying tendency as enlarge current density. The short quasi-semi-circular arc (R = 3.08 Ω) along with lower intersection of the semicircular arc with the real axis (R1 = 0.41 Ω) in Fig. 7f indicate the low internal resistance of ARNBBs and rapid electrolyte ion diffusion rate in ARNBBs [31]. After 1800 cycles at 2 A/g, ARNBBs deliver a capacity retention of 50.7% with 98.9% coulombic efficiency (Fig. 7g). This battery possesses a maximum energy density of 34.8 Wh/kg along with power density of 691.0 W/kg at 1 A/g. A power density of 4400.5 W/kg along with energy density of 9.7 Wh/kg can be yielded at 10 A/g (Fig. 7h). One LED bulb can be lighted by two aqueous ARNBBs connected in series, indicating promising potential application of this aqueous battery system (Fig. 7i).

CONCLUSIONS

In this work, high performances ARNBBs are assembled with highly crystalline Bi2O3 with ‘cookie’-like micromorphology as anode active materials, and CoNi-CoNiO2@NCLDH as the cathode. Bi2O3 anode can portray an admirable capacity of 266.7 mAh/g at 2 A/g with 76.2% capacity retention at 20 A/g, and 62.6% capacity retention after 1900 cycles at 15 A/g. The CoNi-CoNiO2@NCLDH heterostructure nanoarrays can deliver a capacity of 249.7 and 112.0 mAh/g at 1 and 20 A/g, respectively. The assembled ARNBBs deliver a maximum energy density of 34.8 Wh/kg along with power density of 691.0 W/kg at 1 A/g, illustrating that highly crystalline Bi2O3 together with CoNi-CoNiO2@NCLDH possesses a bright prospect in aqueous Ni-Bi batteries.

Notes

Authors’ contributions

· Performed experiment: Wei-wei Kang

· Wrote the article: Ze-xu Ji, Wen-Qing Zhang, Hai-tao Zeng

· Made substantial contributions to conception and design of the study and performed data analysis and interpretation: Wei-wei Kang, Wei-jie Guo, Bing Xu, Bao-ping Lin

· Performed data acquisition, as well as provided administrative, technical, and material support: Wei-Jie Guo, Bao-ping Lin.

Availability of data and materials

Supporting information is available from the authors.

Financial support and sponsorship

This work is financially supported by Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province of China (No. 232300420299), and the Scientific and Technological Project of Henan Province (No. 232102240079).

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Fig. 1.
Characterization of Bi2O3 : XRD pattern (a); XPS spectra: survey (b), Bi 4f (c) and O 1s (d)
jecst-2025-00780f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
Micromorphology of Bi2O3 : SEM images (a and b); TEM images (c and d).
jecst-2025-00780f2.jpg
Fig. 3.
Electrochemical performances of Bi2O3 : CV curves (a); Fitting of cathodic/anodic peak current versus scan rate (b); GCD profiles (c); Rate capability (d); EIS (e) and cycling durability (f)
jecst-2025-00780f3.jpg
Fig. 4.
XRD patterns (a and b); XPS spectra of CoNi-CoNiO2 @NCLDH: survey (c), Co 2p (d), Ni 2p (e) and O 1s (f)
jecst-2025-00780f4.jpg
Fig. 5.
SEM (a and b) and TEM (c and d) images of CoNi-CoNiO2 @NCLDH
jecst-2025-00780f5.jpg
Fig. 6.
CV curves of CoNi-CoNiO2 @NCLDH (a); The relation between anodic/cathodic peak current and scan rate (b); GCD profiles of CoNi-CoNiO2 @NCLDH (c); Specific capacities of CoNi-CoNiO2 @NCLDH and CoNi-CoNiO2 (d); Cycling performance of CoNi-CoNiO2 @NCLDH at 20 A/g (e); EIS of CoNi-CoNiO2 @NCLDH and CoNi-CoNiO2 (f)
jecst-2025-00780f6.jpg
Fig. 7.
Electrochemical behaviors of ARNBBs: CV curves of single electrode (a); CV profiles (b); Discharging curves (c); GCD curves (d); Rate capability (e); EIS (f); Cycling durability together with coulombic efficiency at 2 A/g (g); Ragone plot (h) and picture about LED bulb lighted (i)
jecst-2025-00780f7.jpg
Scheme 1.
Preparation procedure for anode (a) and cathode (b); Assembly of the aqueous rechargeable nickel-bismuth batteries (c)
jecst-2025-00780f8.jpg

REFERENCES

[1] D. Ba, Y. Li, Y. Sun, Z. Guo and J. Liu, Sci. China Mater., 2019, 62, 487–496.
crossref pdf
[2] J. Sun, J. Wang, Z. Li, L. Niu, W. Hong and S. Yang, J. Power Sources, 2015, 274, 1070–1075.
crossref
[3] F. Ma, L. YU, C. Xu and D. Lou, Energy Environ. Sci., 2016, 9(3), 862–866.
crossref
[4] J. Sun, Z. Li, J. Wang, W. Hong, P. Gong, P. Wen, Z. Wang and S. Yang, J. Alloy Compd., 2015, 643, 231–238.
crossref
[5] K. Kin, J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol., 2025, 16(1), 37–53.
crossref pdf
[6] W. Kang, Y. Zhao, W. Zhang, Y. Sun, X. Zhang, G. Yi, G. Huang, B. Xing, C. Zhang and B. Lin, Rare Met., 2023, 42, 902–915.
crossref pdf
[7] X. Zhu, J. Xu, Q. Zhang, T. Shen, Y. Zhuang, T. Chen, S. Li, L. Gu and H. Xia, Nat. Commun., 2025, 16, 3838.

[8] Y.-L. Liu, M.-Q. Li, G.-G. Wang, L.-Y. Dang, F. Li, M.-E. Pam, H.-Y. Zhang, J.-C. Han and H.-Y. Yang, Energy Environ. Mater., 2021, 4(3), 465–473.
crossref pdf
[9] J. Chang, W. Liang, F. Xu, D. Wu, K. Jiang, G. Wang and Z. Gao, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2023, 639, 96–106.
crossref
[10] Y.-L. Liu, M.-Q. Li, G.-G. Wang, L.-Y. Dang, F. Li, D. Yan, M.-L. Tan, H.-Y. Zhang and H.-Y. Yang, Electrochim. Acta., 2022, 427, 140833.
crossref
[11] J. Xu, Z. Meng, Z. Hao, X. Sun, H. Nan, H. Liu, Y. Wang, W. Shi, H. Tian and X. Hu, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2022, 609, 878–889.
crossref
[12] G. Zan, T. Wu, P. Hu, Y. Zhou, S. Zhao, S. Xu, J. Chen, Y. Cui and Q. Wu, Energy Storage Mater., 2020, 28, 82–90.
crossref
[13] H. Zheng, H. Li, M. Yu, M. Zhang, Y. Tong, F. Cheng and X. Lu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 48(5), 25539–25544.

[14] P. Zhang, Y. Zeng, M. Wang, W. Xu, Y. Liu and X. Lu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6(19), 8895–8900.
crossref
[15] L. Wu, Y.-G. Liu, H. Zhao, Y. Zhang, Z. Wang, X. Zhang, B. Zhu, P. He and Y. Liu, ChemistrySelect, 2024, 9(10), e202304973.

[16] Y. Liu, J. Li, Y. Liu, M. Wang, K. Liu and H. Cui, J. Energy Storage, 2024, 81, 110436.
crossref
[17] J. Wang, D. Wang, Y. Chu, S. Zha, M. Wu, C. Liu, W. Wang, N. Mitsuzaki, S. Jia and Z. Chen, J. Energy Storage, 2023, 73, 109165.
crossref
[18] J. Ye, X. Zhai, L. Chen, W. Guo, T. Gu, Y. Shi, J. Hou, F. Han, Y. Liu, C. Fan, G. Wang, S. Peng and X. Guo, J. Energy Chem., 2021, 62, 252–261.
crossref
[19] Z. Shi, X. Xu, P. Jing, B. Liu and J. Zhang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2023, 15(5), 7263–7273.
crossref pdf
[20] M. A. Yewale, R. A. Kadam, N. K. Kaushik, N. N. Linh, A. M. Teli, J. C. Shin, L. P. Lingamdinne, J. R. Koduru and D. K. Shin, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2022, 800, 139654.
crossref
[21] Y. Xue, Z. Xie, X. Liu, L. Liu, Y. Li, Y. Hua, X. Zhao and X. Liu, J. Energy Storage., 2022, 51, 104602.
crossref
[22] Q. Liu, J. Liu, D. Xu, C. Liu, Z. Lu, D. Xuan, Z. Wang, Y. Ye, D. Wang, S. Li, D. Wang and Z. Zheng, J. Electroanal. Chem., 2022, 908, 116068.
crossref
[23] S. Dong, X. Ding, T. Guo, X. Yue, X. Han and J. Sun, Chem. Eng. J., 2017, 316, 778–789.
crossref
[24] Y. Zhao, X. He, R. Chen, Q. Liu, J. Jiu, J. Yu, J. Li, H. Zhang, H. Dong, M. Zhang and J. Wang, Chem. Eng. J., 2018, 352, 29–38.
crossref
[25] P. Wang, L. Xu, Y. Ao and C. Wang, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2017, 495, 122–129.
crossref
[26] W. Kang, Y. Sun, B. Xu, J. Li, X. Kong, D. Huang, X. Zhang, H. Yang and B. Lin, Electrochim. Acta, 2019, 323, 134819.
crossref
[27] S. Schmidt, E.-T. Kubaski, D.-P. Volanti, T. Sequinel, V. D. N. Bezzon and S. M. Tebcherani, Part. Sci. Technol., 2019, 37(8), 927–931.
crossref
[28] Z. Wang, Z. Zhao, Y. Zhang, G. Pang, X. Sun, J. Zhang, L. Hou and C. Yuan, J. Alloys Compd., 2019, 779, 81–90.
crossref
[29] C. Fan, X. Zhang, L. Chen, H. Fu, H. Li, J. Hou, F. Yu, H. Li, Y. Shi and X. Guo, New J. Chem., 2019, 43(38), 15066–15071.
crossref
[30] X. Li, C. Guan, Y. Hu and J. Wang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9(31), 26008–26015.
crossref
[31] W. Kang, X. Kong, J. Li, P. Wang, Y. Sun, X. Zhang, H. Yang and B. Lin, Mater. Today Energy, 2020, 18, 100549.
crossref
[32] X. He, R. Li, J. Liu, Q. Liu, R. Chen, D. Song and J. Wang, Chem. Eng. J., 2018, 334, 1573–1583.
crossref
[33] Q. Li, Q. Zhang, J. Sun, C. Liu, J. Guo, B. He, Z. Zhou, P. Man, C. Li, L. Xie and Y. Yao, Adv. Sci., 2019, 6(2), 1801379.

[34] L. Wan, D. Chen, J. Liu, Y. Zhang, J. Chen, M. Xie and C. Du, J. Power Sources, 2020, 465, 228293.
crossref
[35] T. Qin, X. Chu, T. Deng, B. Wang, X. Zhang, T. Dong, Z. Li, X. Fan, X. Ge, Z. Wang, P. Wang, W. Zhang and W. Zheng, J. Energy Chem., 2020, 48, 21–28.
crossref
[36] M. B. Zakaria, D. Zheng, U.-P. Apfel, T. Nagata, E. S. Kenawy and J. Lin, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2020, 12(36), 40186–40193.
crossref
[37] C.-V.-V.-M. Gopi, S. Sambasivam, K.-V.-G. Raghavendra, R. Vinodh, I. M. Obaidat and H.-J. Kim, J. Energy Storage, 2020, 30, 101550.
crossref
[38] Y. Li, Z. Luo, H. Qin, S. Liang, L. Chen, H. Wang, C. Zhao and S. Chen, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2021, 582, 842–851.
crossref
[39] Y. Wang, Z. Yin, G. Yan, Z. Wang, X. Li, H. Guo and J. Wang, Electrochim. Acta, 2020, 336, 135734.
crossref
[40] J. Lin, L. Yao, Z. Li, P. Zhang, Q. Yuan and L. Deng, Nanoscale, 2019, 11, 3281–3291.
crossref
[41] Z. Liu, Y. Ma, W. Gu, C. Yuan and F. Teng, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 2020, 147, 109578.
crossref
[42] R. Li, X. Li, C. Liu, M. Ye, Q. Yang, Z. Liu, L. Xie and G. Yang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2020, 517, 145841.
crossref
[43] B. Cui, C. Wang, S. Huang, L. He, S. Zhang, Z. Zhang and M. Du, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2020, 578, 10–23.
crossref
[44] X. Zhou, Z. Jia, A. Feng, S. Qu, X. Wang, X. Liu, B. Wang and G. Wu, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2020, 575, 130–139.
crossref
[45] Y. Jiang, Y. Wang, D. Zeng, Y. Xiao, H. Wang, X. Zhang and X. Dai, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2018, 272, 222–231.
crossref
TOOLS
Share :
Facebook Twitter Linked In Google+ Line it
METRICS Graph View
  • 0 Crossref
  •   Scopus
  • 930 View
  • 22 Download
Related articles in J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
E-mail: journal@kecs.or.kr    Tel: +82-2-568-9392               

Copyright © 2026 by The Korean Electrochemical Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next