Effects of Electroless Deposition Conditions on the Hydrogen Generation Kinetics of Co-Fe-P Catalysts via Hydrolysis of Ammonia Borane Solution

Article information

J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol. 2025;16(4):485-493
Publication date (electronic) : 2025 June 11
doi : https://doi.org/10.33961/jecst.2025.00360
Industrial component R&D Department, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology
*CORRESPONDENCE T: +82-32-850-0238 E: sk0514@kitech.re.kr
Received 2025 April 29; Accepted 2025 June 9.

Abstract

This study investigates the fabrication and optimization of Co-Fe-P catalysts on Cu foam using electroless deposition, focusing on their hydrogen generation efficiency. Deposition times were varied from 1 to 10 minutes, resulting in spherical Co-Fe-P particles growing from sub-micron to several microns in size. The optimal hydrogen generation rate of 27.66mL/min was achieved with a 5-minute deposition. Extending the deposition to 10 minutes led to particle aggregation, reducing the efficiency per unit weight. The impact of bath temperatures from 30°C to 60°C was also assessed, with temperatures of 50°C and above promoting the development of larger 3D structures and increasing Fe and P contents (~9.3 wt.% and 10 wt.%). This enhanced hydrogen generation, peaking again at 27.66 mL/min. NaOH concentrations were varied from 0.5 M to 0.9 M, showing that concentrations over 0.8 M improved catalyst morphology and performance, increasing hydrogen generation to 10.03 mL/min. Among substrates tested, Co-Fe-P on Cu foam demonstrated the highest hydrogen generation rate due to better catalyst distribution and surface area. The study underscores the importance of deposition conditions and substrate choice in optimizing Co-Fe-P catalysts for hydrogen generation.

INTRODUCTION

Hydrogen energy has garnered significant interest as a potential future energy source due to its clean nature, widespread availability, and high energy density [17]. Chemical hydrides, including NH3BH3, NaBH4, and LiBH4, have risen in popularity as effective hydrogen storage materials due to their ability to securely store hydrogen and release it efficiently through catalytic hydrolysis [811]. Ammonia borane (NH3BH3) is especially notable for its impressive theoretical hydrogen storage potential, containing up to 19.6 wt.% H2, and its capacity to release hydrogen through both pyrolysis and hydrolysis in neutral water [1219]. When catalyzed, the hydrolysis of NH3BH3, as shown in equation 1, produces hydrogen with an output of 8.96 wt.% [20].

(1) NH3BH3+2H2ONH4++BO2-+3H2

The hydrolysis of NH3BH3 is a multistep reaction where water molecules interact with the B-H bonds in the NH3BH3 molecule. Initially, water acts as a nucleophile, attacking the B-H bonds, leading to the release of hydrogen gas. As the reaction proceeds, the BH3 group is converted into a BO2– (borate) ion, while the NH3 group is protonated to form NH4+ (ammonium) ions. The overall reaction yields three moles of H2 for every mole of NH3BH3. This reaction is thermodynamically favorable under mild conditions, especially when a catalyst is present to accelerate the rate of hydrogen generation [20]. The efficiency of NH3BH3 hydrolysis is largely dependent on the effectiveness of the catalysts used, making it essential to develop high-performance catalysts for rapid hydrogen production [2123]. Precious metals like Ru and Pt have been employed to accelerate the hydrolysis of NH3BH3 [24,25]. However, the high cost of these metals limits their commercial viability. To address this issue, research has shifted towards exploring more affordable yet efficient alternatives, particularly those based on Co and Ni [2630]. Co-P catalysts have been widely used in various catalytic applications such as chemical hydride and electrocatalysis due to their high electrochemical activity. This superior activity is believed to stem from the electronic state separation caused by the difference in electronegativity between cobalt and phosphorus [2627]. Researchers have pursued two primary strategies to enhance the activity of Co-P catalysts. The first strategy focuses on increasing the catalyst’s surface area by employing porous structures, with foam-like frameworks being the most commonly explored [27]. The second approach involves altering the electronic structure by incorporating transition metals. Studies have shown that adding transition metals such as Fe, Ni, and Cr results in the development of ternary catalysts with improved performance [3133]. Notably, Fe has received significant attention due to its excellent catalytic activity, prompting further advancements in the design of Fe-doped Co-based catalysts [3134]. This has led to extensive research efforts aimed at the fabrication of Co-Fe-P catalysts using various synthesis methods including electrodeposition technique [3436]. Among these methods, electroless deposition has been recognized as a highly effective and versatile technique for catalyst fabrication, offering uniform metal deposition, cost-efficiency, and enhanced control over the coating process. It is particularly advantageous for coating complex structures such as foam-like frameworks, where it ensures uniform coverage even on intricate surfaces, thereby optimizing catalytic performance [27]. However, research on the synthesis of Co-Fe-P catalysts via electroless deposition, specifically for use as catalysts in chemical hydride of NH3BH3, has not yet been reported.

In this work, we synthesized Co-Fe-P catalysts through electroless deposition method. And we examined the effects of electroless deposition conditions such as deposition time, bath composition, temperature on the hydrogen generation kinetics were examined in NH3BH3 solution.

EXPERIMENTAL

The Co-Fe-P catalysts were synthesized through electroless deposition on Cu sheet, Ni foam, and Cu foam. Prior to electroless deposition, the substrates underwent a catalyzation process involving two steps (Fig. 1). First, the substrates were immersed in a SnCl₂ (99.9%, sigma Aldrich) (1 g L⁻¹) + HCl (1 mL L⁻¹) solu%on for 3 minutes at 25°C to introduce Sn²⁺ ions onto the surface, which serve to protect against oxida%on and prepare the surface for Pd adsorption. This was followed by an acceleration step in a PdCl₂ (99%, sigma Aldrich) (0.1 g L⁻¹) + HCl (1 mL L⁻¹) solu%on for 1 minute at 25°C, where Pd²⁺ ions were adsorbed onto the Sn-coated surface, acting as nucleation sites for electroless plating. The combined Sn-Pd activation process facilitated the efficient deposition of the Co-Fe-P catalysts by providing catalytic sites that promoted the autocatalytic redox reactions, ensuring uniform metal layer formation. The substrates were then washed with distilled water before the electroless deposition process. The electroless deposition bath for the Co-Fe-P catalysts contained 0.1 M CoCl2·6H2O (95%, Junsei), 0.6 M NH2CH2COOH (95%, Junsei), 0.5 M NaH2PO2·H2O (99%, Junsei), and 0.1 M FeCl2 (99%, Samchun) in deionized water, with continuous stirring by a magnetic agitator in a 1L beaker.

Fig. 1.

schematic process of electroless deposited Co-Fe-P/Cu foam catalyst

The pH of the Co-Fe-P bath was adjusted to a range between 10 and 13 by adding NaOH, and the temperature was controlled within a range of 30 to 60°C. The electroless deposition process was carried out for durations between 1 and 10 minutes. After the deposition was completed, the samples were rinsed with DI water, air-blown with nitrogen gas, and then dried in a vacuum desiccator for 24 hours. The surface morphology and composition of the Co-Fe-P catalysts were characterized by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectroscopy (JEOL, JSM-IT800). The SEM/EDX analysis conducted at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV. Hydrogen generation tests were performed in a 60 mL reactor using a 1 wt.% NH3BH3 (95%, sigma Aldrich) solution at temperatures ranging from 30 to 60°C in ambient air. The reactor was submerged in a water bath to ensure temperature stability. The amount of hydrogen gas produced was quantified using a mass flow meter (MFM). The effects of various parameters, including applied current density, electrodeposition time, NH3BH3 concentration, and temperature, on the hydrogen generation kinetics of the Co-Fe-P catalysts were investigated.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Fig. 2 shows the surface morphologies of Co-Fe-P catalysts fabricated by electroless deposition with the change of deposition time from 1 min to 10 min. All the Cu foams were pretreated in Sn based solution containing of SnCl2 and HCl for 3 min at 25°C. After that, they were immersed in Pd solution containing of PdCl2 and HCl for 1min at 25°C. Fig. 2 (a-b) illustrates the spherical morphology of Co-Fe-P particles deposited on Cu foam. The particle size appears to be less than approximately 1 μm. These particles exhibit nucleation on the substrate surface, and in some areas, they aggregate to form powdery structures on the sub-micron scale. After 1 minute of deposition, the amount of deposited catalyst was confirmed to be approximately 3.92 mg, increasing to 4.23 mg after 3 minutes. As the deposition time increased from 3 to 5 minutes, the nucleated particles partially aggregated to form powdery structures of approximately 3–5 μm in size. After 10 minutes of deposition, the nucleated particles grew visibly to approximately 1–2 μm in size, and in some areas, powdery structures around 10 μm in size were observed. The amount of deposited catalyst also increased from 5.78 mg at 5 minutes to 7.59 mg at 10 minutes. Fig. 3 shows the hydrogen generation kinetics of the electroless deposited Co-Fe-P catalysts in the 1 wt.% NH3BH3 solution at 25°C. The catalytic activity was evaluated by measuring the rate of hydrogen generation from the hydrolysis of ammonia borane (NH₃BH₃). With a 1-minute electroless deposition, the hydrogen generation rate was 6.89 mL/min, and this increased to 18.56 mL/min as the deposition time was extended to 3 minutes. Further increasing the deposition time to 5 minutes, the hydrogen generation kinetics were increased to 27.66 mL/min. When considering the weight of the deposited catalyst, the catalytic activity per unit weight was calculated to be 4785 mL/min·g-catalyst. However, when the deposition time was extended to 10 minutes, the hydrogen generation rate showed a similar trend to that observed at 5 minutes. Given the weight of the catalyst deposited after 10 minutes was 28.56 mL/min, the catalytic activity per unit weight was calculated to be 3762 mL/min·g-catalyst. This demonstrates that the hydrogen generation rate of the catalyst deposited for 5 minutes is higher than that of the catalyst deposited for 10 minutes. The increase in particle size and the formation of powdery structures as the deposition time increased led to a more aggregated catalyst layer, which likely caused the decrease in catalytic activity per unit weight.

Fig. 2.

Surface morphology Co-Fe-P catalysts/Cu foam electroless-deposited for (a)1 min, (b) 3 min, (c) 5 min, (d) 10 min.

Fig. 3.

Effects of electroless-deposition time on the hydrogen generation rate of Co-Fe-P

Fig. 4 illustrates the effects of bath temperature on the morphology of Co-Fe-P catalysts. When the bath temperature was increased from 30°C to 50°C, small particles, less than approximately 0.5 μm in size, were well deposited on the substrate surface, partially forming a powdery structure. At a deposition temperature of 60°C, the particle size of Co-Fe-P increased, and particles with diameters of approximately 1–2 μm were observed. The compositional variation of the catalyst with changing bath temperature showed that the Fe content varied from 2.3 wt.% to 11.2 wt.%, while the P content changed from 2.7 wt.% to 10.03 wt.% (Table 1). Fig. 5 shows the effects of electroless deposition bath temperature on the hydrogen generation kinetics of Co-Fe-P catalysts. As the bath temperature increased from 30°C to 40°C, the hydrogen generation rate rose from 1.218 mL/min to 5.42 mL/min. Further increases in temperature to 50°C and 60°C resulted in dramatic increases in the hydrogen generation rate, reaching 27.06 mL/min and 27.66 mL/min, respectively. Morphologically, as shown in Fig. 3, the surface at 30°C and 40°C exhibits small grains, primarily in a 2D structure deposited on the substrate. However, at bath temperatures above 50°C, a 3D structure extending outward from the substrate was observed. Catalytic activity is fundamentally related to surface area, and the increase in surface area due to this 3D growth is considered to be a significant factor in enhancing catalytic activity. Additionally, the activity of the deposited catalyst is closely related to its composition. According to the literature, Co-Fe-P catalysts exhibit higher activity when the Fe and P contents are each around 10 wt.%. Below a deposition temperature of 40°C, the Fe content was approximately 4 wt.% and the P content was around 5 wt.% as shown in table1. However, at temperatures above 50°C, the Fe content increased to approximately 9.3 wt.% and the P content to 10 wt.%, similar to compositions reported in previous studies. Therefore, the higher hydrogen generation rates observed at deposition temperatures above 50°C can be attributed not only to the 3D structure of the deposited morphology but also to the higher Fe and P content in the deposited composition. Fig. 6 illustrates the surface morphology of Co-Fe-P catalysts deposited using an electroless deposition bath with varying NaOH concentrations of 0.6 M ~ 0.9 M. The figures indicate that all catalyst samples exhibited a relatively uniform distribution of catalyst particles across the surface of the substrate. It is evident that when the NaOH concentration increased from 0.5 M to 0.7 M, no significant alteration in surface morphology was observed. The catalyst particles maintained a consistent structure, without any noticeable changes in particle size or arrangement. However, a more pronounced change in the surface morphology became apparent when the NaOH concentration reached 0.8 M. Under this condition, the nanometer-scale particles, which initially covered the surface, experienced significant growth, resulting in the formation of a powdery surface structure with particles measuring approximately 1μm in size. This transformation in surface morphology is attributed to the increased pH of the solution, which facilitated the growth of the deposited particles. Fig. 7 presents the effects of NaOH concentration in the electroless deposition bath on the hydrogen generation kinetics of Co-Fe-P catalysts in a 1 wt.% NH₃BH₃ solution at 25°C. The results indicate that the hydrogen generation rate remained relatively consistent, ranging from 2.8 mL/min to 3 mL/min, as the NaOH concentration increased from 0.5 M to 0.7 M. This consistency in catalytic activity corresponds with the limited changes observed in the surface morphology over the same concentration range. The stability of the hydrogen generation rate suggests that the surface area and active sites of the catalysts were not significantly affected by the increase in NaOH concentration within this range. However, a substantial enhancement in hydrogen generation kinetics was observed when the NaOH concentration reached 0.8 M. At this concentration, the hydrogen generation rate increased sharply to 10.03 mL/min. This marked improvement in catalytic performance is likely due to the significant surface morphological changes, where the initially flat catalyst surface developed powdery, protruding structures. These new surface features increased the overall surface area of the catalyst, thereby enhancing the number of active sites available for the hydrolysis reaction, leading to improved hydrogen generation efficiency. Fig. 8 compares the surface morphology of various substrates, including a Cu sheet, Ni foam, and Cu foam, both before and after the deposition of Co-Fe-P catalysts via electroless deposition. The surface of the Cu sheet displayed a relatively rough and uneven texture, characterized by irregularities and imperfections on the surface. In contrast, the Ni foam and Cu foam exhibited more organized and compact structures with dense, interconnected networks. The Co-Fe-P catalysts on Cu sheet, Ni foam, Cu foam were electroless deposited at 60°C for 5min. After deposited, it was observed that the Cu sheet did not achieve uniform catalyst deposition. In several regions, the catalyst particles appeared to cluster together, forming powdery agglomerates, while other areas remained largely uncovered, revealing the original Cu sheet surface. This uneven deposition may have resulted from the surface roughness of the Cu sheet, which hindered uniform nucleation and growth of the catalyst particles. In contrast, both the Ni foam and Cu foam exhibited a much more uniform distribution of Co-Fe-P catalysts across their entire surface areas. The foam structures appeared to promote more even nucleation and growth, leading to a homogeneous coating of catalyst particles. The catalytic performance of Co-Fe-P catalysts on different substrates was evaluated through hydrogen generation experiments, as illustrated in Fig. 9. The hydrogen generation rates were measured during the hydrolysis of a 1 wt.% NH₃BH₃ solution at room temperature. The Cu sheet exhibited the lowest catalytic activity, with a hydrogen generation rate of 4.236 mL/min, which could be attributed to the non-uniform deposition and reduced surface area of the catalyst on this substrate. On the other hand, the Co-Fe-P/Ni foam catalyst demonstrated a moderate improvement in activity, with a hydrogen generation rate of 6.317 mL/min. However, the most significant catalytic performance was observed with the Co-Fe-P/Cu foam catalyst, which achieved a hydrogen generation rate of 27.66 mL/min. According to previous studies, copper catalysts has been recognized as a highly efficient catalyst for NH₃BH₃ hydrolysis, and there have been reports on the development of binary high-performance catalysts composed of cobalt and copper. The enhanced hydrogen generation rate of Co-Fe-P/Cu foam, compared to Co-Fe-P/Cu foam, is attributed to its larger active surface area. Furthermore, the superior catalytic performance of copper foam over Co-Fe-P/Ni foam is likely due to the stronger synergistic interaction between copper and cobalt, which has a more pronounced effect on catalytic activity than the interaction between nickel and cobalt [34].

Fig. 4.

Surface morphology of Co-Fe-P catalysts with the electroless deposition bath temperature of (a) 30°C, (b) 40°C, (c) 50°C, (d) 60°C.

Composition of Co-Fe-P catalysts fabricated by electroless deposition with the change of bath temperature

Fig. 5.

Effects of electroless-deposition bath temperature on the hydrogen generation kinetics of Co-Fe-P catalysts

Fig. 6.

Surface morphology of Co-Fe-P catalysts with the NaOH concentration of (a) 0.5M, (b) 0.6M (c) 0.7M (d) 0.8M in electroless deposition bath.

Fig. 7.

Effects of NaOH concentration of electroless-deposited bath on the hydrogen generation kinetics of Co-Fe-P catalysts 1 wt.% NH3BH3 solution at 25°C.

Fig. 8.

Surface morphology of (a) Cu sheet, (b) Ni foam, (c) Cu foam and electroless-deposited Co-Fe-P catalysts on (d,g) Cu sheet, (e,h) Ni foam, (f,i) Cu foam

Fig. 9.

Effects of various substrates on the hydrogen generation kinetics of Co-Fe-P catalysts

CONCLUSIONS

This study effectively synthesized Co-Fe-P catalysts using electroless deposition, highlighting the importance of deposition parameters like time, temperature, NaOH concentration, and substrate type on catalyst morphology and performance. Increasing deposition time from 1 to 5 minutes improved catalyst particle growth and aggregation, with the 5-minute deposit achieving the highest hydrogen generation rate of 27.66 mL/min in a 1 wt.% NH₃BH₃ solution. Extending the time to 10 minutes resulted in larger, more aggregated particles, which reduced catalytic efficiency, as the hydrogen rate did not improve beyond the 5-minute mark. The deposition temperature also significantly influenced catalyst morphology and activity. Temperatures above 50°C led to better 3D structures and higher Fe and P contents, with optimal performance observed at 60°C. Increasing NaOH concentration to 0.8 M improved surface morphology, enhancing catalytic efficiency and boosting the hydrogen generation rate to 10.03 mL/min. Among various substrates, the Co-Fe-P/Cu foam catalyst performed best, with a hydrogen rate of 27.66 mL/min, outperforming Co-Fe-P catalysts on Ni foam and Cu sheet substrates. This superior performance is attributed to the foam's uniform catalyst distribution and high surface area, which promoted effective particle nucleation and growth. The study underscores the need for precise control of deposition conditions and substrate selection to maximize Co-Fe-P catalyst performance for hydrogen generation.

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was conducted with the support of Key-Tech project of KITECH (EH250008)

References

1. Kim J, Jung S.-M, Kim K.-S, You S.-H, Lee B.-J, Kim Y.-T. J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol. 2022;13(4):417–423.
2. Zhang B, Li X, Liu M. J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol. 2024;15(3):353–364.
3. Lee H. J, Kim J, Ma A, Lee S, Lee J, Park H.-Y, Park H. S, Song K. H, Jang J. H, Cho S. K. J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol. 2025;16(2):171–179.
4. Song J, Liao L, Zhang Z, Yusran Y, Wang R, Fang J, Liu Y, Hou Y, Wang Y, Fang Q. Crystals 2022;12:880–888.
5. Ali S. A, Alshehri S. M, Ahmad T. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024;82:1182–1195.
6. Ali S. A, Majumdar S, Chowdhury P. K, Alshehri S. M, Ahmad T. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2024;7:7325–7337.
7. Ali S. A, Ahmad T. Small 2024;:2403401–2403414.
8. Eom K, Cho K, Kwon H. J. Power Sources 2008;180:484–490.
9. Lee J, Kong K, Jung C, Cho E, Yoon S, Han J, Lee T, Nam S. Catal. Today 2007;120:305–310.
10. Dai H, Liang Y, Wang P, Cheng H. J. Power Sources 2008;177:17–23.
11. Dai H, Liang Y, Wang P, Yao X, Rufford T, Lu M, Cheng H. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008;33:4405–4412.
12. Umegaki T, Imai H, Xu Q, Kojima Y. J. Porous Mater. 2024;31:2043–2052.
13. Pachfule P, Yang X, Zhu Q, Tsumori N, Uchida T, Xu Q. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017;5:4835–4841.
14. Umegaki T, Hui S, Kojima Y. New J. Chem. 2017;41:992–996.
15. Lu D, Yu G, Li Y, Chen M, Pan Y, Zhou L, Yang K, Xiong X, Wu P, Xia Q. J. Alloys Compd. 2017;694:662–671.
16. Yang X, Li L, Sang W, Zhao J, Wang X, Yu C, Zhang X, Tang C. J. Alloys Compd. 2017;693:642–649.
17. Demirci U, Miele P. J. Power Sources 2010;195:4030–4035.
18. Umegaki T, Ogawa R, Ohki S, Tansho M, Shimizu T, Kojima Y. J. Porous Mater. 2019;26:611–617.
19. Jiang H, Xu Q. Catal. Today 2011;170:56–63.
20. Rossin A, Peruzzini M. Chem. Rev. 2016;116:8848–8872.
21. Umegaki T, Yan J, Zhang X. J. Power Sources 2009;191:209–216.
22. Eom K, Cho K, Kwon H. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010;35:181–186.
23. Yan J, Zhang X, Han S, Shioyama H, Xu Q. J. Power Sources 2009;194:478–482.
24. Chandra M, Xu Q. J. Power Sources 2007;168:135–142.
25. Chandra M, Xu Q. J. Power Sources 2006;156:190–194.
26. Cho K, Eom K, Kwon H. Catal. Today 2007;120:298–304.
27. Eom K, Kim M, Kim R, Nam D, Kwon H. J. Power Sources 2010;195:2830–2834.
28. Amoo K, Onyeozili E, Kalu E, Omoleye J, Efeovbokhan V. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016;41:21221–21235.
29. Oh S, Kim H, Kwon Y, Kim M, Cho E, Kwon H. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016;4:18272–18277.
30. Chou C, Chen B. J. Power Sources 2015;293:343–350.
31. Qiu F, Dai Y, Li L, Xu C, Huang Y, Chen C, Wang Y, Jiao L, Yuan H. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014;39:436–441.
32. Liao J, Li H, Zhang X, Feng K, Yao Y. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2016;6:3893–3899.
33. Li M, Hu J, Lu H. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2016;6:7186–7192.
34. Oh S, Song D, Kim H, Sohn D, Hong K, Lee M, Son S, Cho E, Kwon H. J. Alloys Compd. 2019;806:643–649.
35. Mendoza-Garcia A, Zhu H, Yu Y, Li Q, Zhou L, Su D, Kramer M, Sun S. Angew. Chem. 2015;127:9778–9781.
36. Mendoza-Garcia A, Su D, Sun S. Nanoscale 2016;8:3244–3247.
37. Li C, Zhou J, Gao W, Zhao J, Liu J, Zhao Y, Wei M, Evans D. G, Duan X. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013;1:5370–5376.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1.

schematic process of electroless deposited Co-Fe-P/Cu foam catalyst

Fig. 2.

Surface morphology Co-Fe-P catalysts/Cu foam electroless-deposited for (a)1 min, (b) 3 min, (c) 5 min, (d) 10 min.

Fig. 3.

Effects of electroless-deposition time on the hydrogen generation rate of Co-Fe-P

Fig. 4.

Surface morphology of Co-Fe-P catalysts with the electroless deposition bath temperature of (a) 30°C, (b) 40°C, (c) 50°C, (d) 60°C.

Fig. 5.

Effects of electroless-deposition bath temperature on the hydrogen generation kinetics of Co-Fe-P catalysts

Fig. 6.

Surface morphology of Co-Fe-P catalysts with the NaOH concentration of (a) 0.5M, (b) 0.6M (c) 0.7M (d) 0.8M in electroless deposition bath.

Fig. 7.

Effects of NaOH concentration of electroless-deposited bath on the hydrogen generation kinetics of Co-Fe-P catalysts 1 wt.% NH3BH3 solution at 25°C.

Fig. 8.

Surface morphology of (a) Cu sheet, (b) Ni foam, (c) Cu foam and electroless-deposited Co-Fe-P catalysts on (d,g) Cu sheet, (e,h) Ni foam, (f,i) Cu foam

Fig. 9.

Effects of various substrates on the hydrogen generation kinetics of Co-Fe-P catalysts

Table 1.

Composition of Co-Fe-P catalysts fabricated by electroless deposition with the change of bath temperature

Composition of Co-Fe-P Temperature
30°C 40°C 50°C 60°C
P (wt.%) 4.54 2.73 10.03 6.99
Fe (wt.%) 2.36 3.93 9.32 11.20
Co (wt.%) 93.10 93.34 80.65 81.81