J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol Search


J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol > Volume 9(4); 2018 > Article
Cho, Yun, Arunachalam, Ahn, Kim, Lim, and Kang: Nanolayered CuWO4 Decoration on Fluorine-Doped SnO2 Inverse Opals for Solar Water Oxidation


The pristine fluorine-doped SnO2 (abbreviated as FTO) inverse opal (IO) was developed using a 410 nm polystyrene bead template. The nanolayered copper tungsten oxide (CuWO4) was decorated on the FTO IO film using a facile electrochemical deposition, subsequently followed by annealing at 500°C for 90 min. The morphologies, crystalline structure, optical properties and photoelectrochemical characteristics of the FTO and CuWO4-decorated FTO (briefly denoted as FTO/CuWO4) IO film were investigated by field emission scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, UV-vis spectroscopy and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, showing FTO IO in the hexagonally closed-pack arrangement with a pore diameter and wall thickness of about 300 nm and 20 nm, respectively. Above this film, the CuWO4 was electrodeposited by controlling the cycling number in cyclic voltammetry, suggesting that the CuWO4 formed during 4 cycles (abbreviated as CuWO4(4 cycles)) on FTO IO film exhibited partial distribution of CuWO4 nanoparticles. Additional distribution of CuWO4 nanoparticles was observed in the case of FTO/CuWO4(8 cycles) IO film. The CuWO4 layer exhibits triclinic structure with an indirect band gap of approximately 2.5 eV and shows the enhanced visible light absorption. The photoelectrochemical (PEC) behavior was evaluated in the 0.5 M Na2SO4 solution under solar illumination, suggesting that the FTO/CuWO4(4 cycles) IO films exhibit a photocurrent density (Jsc) of 0.42 mA/cm2 at 1.23 V vs. reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE, denoted as VRHE), while the FTO IO and FTO/CuWO4(8 cycles) IO films exhibited a Jsc of 0.14 and 0.24 mA/cm2 at 1.23 VRHE, respectively. This difference can be explained by the increased visible light absorption by the CuWO4 layer and the favorable charge separation/transfer event in the cascading band alignment between FTO and CuWO4 layer, enhancing the overall PEC performance.

1. Introduction

Photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting is regarded as an ideal way to generate H2 energy in an aqueous solution without any external bias using an eco-friendly method. PEC mainly consists of two processes: (1) the hydrogen-evolution reaction (HER) is a relatively rapid process to generate H2 molecules in a reversible anodic reaction with only two electrons, and (2) the oxygen-evolution reaction (OER), which is a rate-limiting step in which four protons and four electrons from two water molecules participate in bond formation (σ + π of O2) [1]. Accordingly, the rate control to catalyze the O-O bond formation is a crucial determinant of the photo-conversion efficiency of water splitting. As a result, the study has been focused on the development and discovery of new photoelectrodes. Usually, metal oxides have been extensively used for photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical hydrogen evolution due to their chemical stability, nontoxicity and relatively low cost [2,3]. In particular, since the discovery of catalytic water splitting on TiO2 photoelectrodes by Fujishima and Honda [4], considerable efforts have been devoted to developing high efficiency metal oxides in the reaction. However, the large band gap (Eg) of TiO2 (> 3.0 eV) limits its light absorption to only 5% of solar light similar to ZnO, Nb2O5 and SnO2. Considering the intimate relationship with photocurrent density and incident solar light absorption in PEC system, the exploration of narrower bandgap materials (e.g., WO3, α-Fe2O3, BiVO4) as photoelectrodes is a reasonable approach to enhanced visible light capture [5-7]. More recently, copper tungstate (CuWO4, Eg = 2.25 eV), which is another material showing visible light absorption to have n-type behavior, has been actively investigated because of its narrower bandgap relative to that of WO3 (Eg = 2.8 eV), the high chemical stability resulting from strong covalency associated with the copper oxygen bonds, inhibition of dissolution to form soluble tungstates by the known acid-base reaction in WO3 at pH > 5, and high chemoselectivity even in the Cl solution [8]. Furthermore, the edge potential of conduction band is similar to that of WO3, but the edge potential of valence band is lower than that of WO3 to approximately 0.5 V [9]. However, CuWO4 with poor charge separation efficiency and slow kinetics in the electrolyte interfacial region still exhibits low photoconversion efficiency for OER. Therefore, approaches such as the introduction of effective OER electrocatalyst to minimize the energy penalty associated with water oxidation improved the catalytic efficiency and lowered the excessive potential closely related to the interfacial charge transfer. Specifically, nonprecious and abundant electrocatalysts including Mn-phosphate (MnPO), Co-phosphate, and Ni-based electrocatalysts, have been widely used to reveal the remarkable increase in electrocatalytic properties [10]. Bartlett’s group reported that the MnPO-based CuWO4 photoelectrode exhibited improved PEC performance, corresponding to the cathodic shift of the onset potential for water oxidation by ~ 100 mV and a mild increase in photocurrent density, particularly at low applied bias [11]. In addition, iron doping or hydrogen treatment of the CuWO4 film increased the bulk electronic conductivity [12]. Another strategy involved formation of heterojunctions between CuWO4 and a second semiconductor, such as WO3, BiVO4, and Ag2NCN with synergetic enhancement in photocurrent density. Adam’s group used Ag2NCN to functionalize the CuWO4 surface resulting in 3-fold increase in photocurrent density, attributed to more efficient charge separation and hole collection efficiencies under circumstances where the higher position of conduction band edge of Ag2NCN favored charge carrier separation at the interface [13]. Similarly, the WO3/CuWO4 photo-anodes show effective band alignment for charge separation from the conduction band edge of WO3 to CuWO4 resulting in higher photocurrent.
Recently, we reported the photoelectrochemical behavior based on a WO3-coated fluorine-doped SnO2 (FTO) inverse opal (IO) nanostructure [14]. An electrodeposited WO3 film was uniformly coated on the FTO inverse opal template using electrodeposition, contributing to enhanced visible-light absorption resulting in the best photocurrent of 2.9 mA/cm2. FTO takes part in a good electronic conducting skeleton to show semi-metallic property, enabling favorable charge transport in a non-conductive semiconductor photoanode. Further, the 3-dimensional (3D) inverse opal provides sufficient surface area for the PEC reaction, intensifying the light absorption by the photonic crystal effect. Therefore, in the present study, the CuWO4 showing narrower band gap and strong chemical stability relative to that of WO3 was deposited on the FTO inverse opal, directly mediating the PEC reaction, using a facile electrodeposition. According to the number of cycles in the cyclic voltammetry of a specific potential range, the electrodeposited CuWO4 thickness was modulated, suggesting that 4 cycles yielded the optimum photocurrent density. The CuWO4 nanoparticles covered the entire FTO IO film sparsely, contributing to enhanced visible light absorption as well as retardation in charge recombination and dramatic reduction in interfacial resistance. The development and related characterization based on the FTO/CuWO4 IO films are discussed.

2. Experimental

2.1 Preparation of FTO/CuWO4 Inverse Opal Film

FTO (Pilkington TEC GlassTM, sheet resistance 8 Ω sq−1) was cleaned with deionized (DI) water, ethanol, and acetone for 20 min each to minimize the organic contamination and dust partially for use as a template. FTO/CuWO4 IO films were prepared using a modified procedure [15]. Briefly, an aqueous solution containing 10 wt % polystyrene (PS) beads with an average diameter of 410 (±10) nm was spread on the surface of the FTO substrate and subsequently spin-coated at 1000 rpm for 10 s. Subsequently, the precursor solution consisting of tin tetrachloride (SnCl4·5H2O, 30 μL, 0.5 M) containing 10 mol % NH4F as the F source and absolute ethanol as the solvent was dropped on the multilayered PS bead template on a spin-coating, after which the sample was spun at 1,000 rpm for 10 s. After the sample was dried briefly, high-temperature annealing was performed at 500°C for 2 h under ambient air to slowly remove the PS bead template.
In order to deposit a CuWO4 layer on the FTO IO film, we carried out direct electrodeposition in a threeelectrode cell with saturated (sat.) Ag/AgCl (0.11 V versus NHE, briefly designated as 0.11 VNHE), platinum, and the FTO IO film as the reference, counter, and working electrodes, respectively. The composition of the bath solution used was the same as reported previously [16]. The CuWO4 films were electrodeposited on FTO IO film from a 50 mM bath composed of 50 mM Cu(NO3)2·nH2O, 50 mM H2W2O11 and 5 wt% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS). The acidic peroxotungstate precursor was prepared by adding concentrated 30% H2O2 to an appropriate amount of Na2WO4·2H2O in DI water. The acidity of the final solution was adjusted to pH 1.1 by adding 3 mL of concentrated HNO3. The electrodeposition of CuWO4 film was conducted using cyclic voltammetry under potential sweeping between −0.4 V and +0.4 V vs. homemade Ag/AgCl for 4 to 8 cycles at a scan rate 50 mV/s using an Autolab potentiostat (PGSTAT302N.FRA2). After completion of the electrodeposition, the as-deposited films were rinsed with DI water and subsequently annealed at 500°C for 900 min in air.

2.2 Characterization

The surface and cross-sectional morphology of the FTO/CuWO4 inverse opal films were investigated using a JEOL 7500 field-emission scanning electron microscope operating at 10 kV and 10 mA. To further investigate the morphology and crystalline properThe surface and cross-sectional morphology of the FTO/CuWO4 inverse opal films were investigated using a JEOL 7500 field-emission scanning electron microscope operating at 10 kV and 10 mA. To further investigate the morphology and crystalline properties of samples, the high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) using a JEOL-2010 instrument at an operating voltage of 300 kV. The crystalline properties of the FTO/CuWO4 inverse opal films were examined using high-power X-ray diffraction (HP-XRD, X′Pert PRO Multi Purpose X-Ray Diffractometer) with Cu Kα radiation operating at 60 kV and 55 mA. The PEC performance under dark and illumination conditions were assessed using a potentiostat (CHI Instruments, USA) with a homemade Ag/AgCl reference electrode (0.11 V vs normal hydrogen electrode), a Pt mesh counter electrode, and FTO/CuWO4 inverse opal film (electroactive area of 0.2 cm2). The Ag/AgCl electrode can be converted to the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE = NHE at pH 0) using the following equation:
ERHE = EAg/AgCl + 0.0591V · pH + 0.11 V
A 150-W Xe-lamp (100 mW/cm2, AM 1.5 filter) light source and a 0.5 M Na2SO4 solution (pH 6.5) after nitrogen bubbling to remove dissolved oxygen were used to evaluate the PEC performance. The incident photon-to-current efficiency (IPCE) was measured using a homemade system composed of a 150-W xenon light source and a monochromator (HS Technologies, Korea). Moreover, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) on the FTO and the FTO/CuWO4 inverse opal films was used to measure the cell resistance of each component in the PEC working condition under one-sun illumination at the open-circuit voltage (OCV) in the frequency range from 0.1 Hz to 10 kHz with amplitude of ±10 mV. To compare with the decay lifetime of FTO and the FTO/CuWO4 inverse opal films, the photovoltage decay measurement was performed as soon as the illumination was blocked. The transmittances of FTO and FTO/CuWO4 IO films were evaluated with UV–vis spectroscopy (PerkinElmer LAMBDA-900 UV/VB/IR spectrometer) at room temperature.

3. Results and Discussion

Fig. 1 represents the high resolution FE-SEM images of the hexagonally aligned FTO, FTO/CuWO4(4 cycles), and FTO/CuWO4(8 cycles) films. Generally, the IO films exhibit honeycomb-shaped hexagonal close-packed array, dense coverage and crack-free structure. Compared with the diameter 410 (± 5) nm of the pristine multilayered PS template arranged in a regular array of close-packed and layered colloids, the pore diameter of IOs was decreased to approximately 300 nm and the pore shrinkage of about 27% probably due to the loss of liquid volume from the precursor and the densification of FTO during the phase transformation from the amorphous to the rutile phase. This shrinkage was similar to the previous case (25-30%) captured from the sol-gel based structure [17]. The wall thickness between each micropore was ~20 nm (± 5) nm with thicker walls at the contact area and the length of the prepared FTO IO was approximately 3.7 μm. A thin CuWO4 layer was coated on the FTO IO films by facile electrodeposition using cyclic voltammetry, altering the number of cycles from 4 cycles (Fig. 1(b)) to 8 cycles (Fig. 1(c)). Both FTO/CuWO4 IO films showed distribution of partially agglomerated CuWO4 nanoparticles through the entire FTO IO surface with a higher density in the FTO/CuWO4(8 cycles) IO film. This result indicates that the increased cycling induced further deposition of CuWO4 layer, although the relation was not directly linear. Hence, it is apparent that the pore diameter was slightly reduced to approximately 10 nm and the wall thickness was irregularly decreased or increased depending on the presence of CuWO4 nanoparticles in well-ordered hexagonal-close packed arrangement of the FTO IO skeleton. To confirm the uniformity of the electrodeposited CuWO4 layer and thickness in the FTO IO films, the cross-sectional images of FTO and FTO/CuWO4(4 cycles) IOs films were measured, as illustrated in the inset of Fig. 1(b). Both samples exhibit a similar thickness of 3.1 μm, disclosing the partial coating of CuWO4 layer into the interior FTO IO films.
To further survey the morphology and crystalline properties of the IO films, the TEM measurements were performed, as presented in Fig. 2. Herein, the FTO and FTO/CuWO4 IO films were prepared for a comparison. In the case of FTO IO film, an assembly of the extremely small crystallites of FTO with an average size of ~ 5 nm was comprised of 3D ordered macroporous IO structure because the FTO IO film was prepared by the sol-gel assisted spin coating method. The pore size of FTO IO film exists in ~ 300 nm to be identical to the image captured from FE-SEM (Fig. 1). Furthermore, to certify the crystallinity of the FTO IO film, the TEM image measured in HR-mode was shown in Fig. 2(d), revealing an inter-planar lattice spacing of 3.35 Å with clear lattice fringes which conforms to the rutile (110) plane of the SnO2 crystal system. In the case of FTO/CuWO4(4cycles) IO film in Fig. 2(b), the less porous IO structure was observed and partially agglomerated owing to the thick CuWO4 coating, attributed from the electrode-position in the repetitively cycling of potential in which the CuWO4 nanoparticles on the vicinity of the initial seed layer formed on the surface of FTO IO can grow quite fast and the uneven coverage via the surface of FTO IO film happened. Also, the crystalline (110) and (0-11) planes from FTO and CuWO4 phase (Fig. 2(e)) were clearly observed from an interplanar lattice spacing of 3.35 Å and 3.77 Å with clear lattice fringes, respectively, which complies with the rutile and triclinic plane of SnO2 and CuWO4 crystal system [18]. Fortunately, the FTO as well as the CuWO4 phases were concurrently found to confirm the crystallinity of the FTO/CuWO4(4cycles) IO films. In the case of FTO/CuWO4(8cycles) IO film in Fig. 2(c and f), the more agglomerated CuWO4 layer on FTO IO film was observed due to the more cycling in the same potential range, further disclosing an inter-planar lattice spacing of 3.35 Å and 3.88 Å with clear lattice fringes which are consistent with the rutile (110) plane and triclinic (110) plane of SnO2 and CuWO4 crystal system.To verify the crystalline properties of FTO, FTO/CuWO4(4cycles), and FTO/CuWO4(8 cycles) IO films, XRD analysis was performed and the results are shown in Fig. 3. All the diffraction peaks in the FTO IO-based samples were indexed to the tetragonal phase of SnO2 (JCPDS no. 41-1445; a = 4.7 Å, c = 3.2 Å) corresponding to (110), (101), (200) and (211) reflections at 26.5°, 33.8°, 37.8° and 51.7°, respectively, even though the 10 wt % F ions were doped in the main SnO2 material. In the case of FTO/CuWO4 IO films, additional triclinic CuWO4 peaks (JCPDF no: 73-1823) with the representative (110), (0-10), (100) and (021) planes at 23.01°, 23.57°, 24.24° and 33.21° were remarkably obtained with a lattice parameter of a = 4.71 Å, b = 4.88 Å and c = 5.84 Å, which was consistent with the preceding literature [18], together with the rutile FTO peaks. In addition, no additional peaks, establishing the absence of other crystallites or impurities such as SnOx and WOx were observed. Furthermore, based on Scherrer’s equation, the average crystallite size of each sample was calculated using the main (100) plane from CuWO4 phase to yield an average grain size of 21.57 nm in 4 and 8 cycles of FTO/CuWO4 IO films, reflecting the absence of further growth of CuWO4 nanoparticles during the cycling of potential.
Fig. 1.

Surface FE-SEM images of (a) FTO, (b) FTO/CuWO4(4cycles) and (c) FTO/CuWO4(8 cycles) IO films.

Fig. 2.

Low magnification TEM images of (a) FTO, (b) FTO/CuWO4(4cycles) and (c) FTO/CuWO4(8 cycles) IO films. High-magnification TEM images of (c) FTO, (d) FTO/CuWO4(4cycles) and (f) FTO/CuWO4(8 cycles) IO films.

Fig. 3.

Typical XRD patterns of (a) FTO, (b) FTO/CuWO4(4cycles) and (c) FTO/CuWO4(8 cycles) IO films.

Fig. 4 depicts the UV-vis transmittance spectra of the FTO, FTO/CuWO4(4 cycles) and FTO/CuWO4(8 cycles) IO films developed on the FTO substrate. The absorption onset for FTO IO was ~ 360 nm, suggesting a UV-active material. On the other hand, it was well known that the CuWO4 shows an indirect band gap due to the absence of sharp absorption, in that the absorptivity coefficient, a, was 6600 cm−1 at 400 nm, which sharply decreased to 1715 cm−1 at 500 nm [16]. Although the CuWO4 exhibited an indirect band gap, it may still result in high photoactivity with nanowire or nanoplatelet morphologies as well as modified charge transport pathways following introduction of other materials. In this study, the absorption onset of FTO/CuWO4 IO film was ~ 470 nm with enhanced light absorption toward visible wavelength. The high transmittance in FTO/CuWO4(4 cycles) IO film indirectly reflects the contribution of increased light absorption corresponding to a little scattering and reflection, compared with that of FTO/CuWO4(8 cycles) IO film in the identical structure. A minor fluctuating absorption band above 500 nm may result from the photonic crystal effect in the 3D inverse opal structure. The precise optical bandgap (Eg) of all samples was calculated by extrapolating the linear portion of the (αhν)1/2 vs hν plot, known as Tauc plot, displayed in Fig. 4(b), where α represents absorption coefficient and hν is the incident photon energy. The estimated Eg of FTO, FTO/CuWO4(4 cycles) and FTO/CuWO4(8 cycles) IO films were 3.55 eV, 2.57 eV, and 2.42 eV, respectively. It has been reported that the original CuWO4 band gap was approximately 2.2 eV. However, increasing the cycle number in cyclic voltammetry elevated the loading amount of CuWO4 layer. Considering that the light recognizes the combined FTO and CuWO4 layers in 3D inverse opal structure, the Eg of FTO/CuWO4(8 cycles) IO film was shifted to a lower band gap, relative to that of 4 cycles, to approach the original band gap of CuWO4. Perhaps, as the loading amount of CuWO4 on the FTO IO film increased further, the total bandgap was decided by the deposited CuWO4 layer to reach to the bandgap of 2.2 eV.
Fig. 4.

(a) UV-vis transmittance spectra and (b) Tauc plot of FTO, FTO/CuWO4(4cycles) and FTO/CuWO4(8 cycles) IO films.

To identify the PEC behavior of FTO and FTO/CuWO4 IO films, the fundamental PEC properties were characterized as shown in Fig. 5. Fig. 5(a) shows a set of linear sweep voltammetry of FTO, FTO/CuWO4(4 cycles) and FTO/CuWO4(8 cycles) IO films under chopped illumination (AM 1.5G, 100 mW/cm2) in 0.5 M Na2SO4 (pH 6.5). Considering that the dark current acquired under dark was in the range of ~ 10−2 mA/cm2, the photoresponse of all the samples was remarkably under light illumination. Furthermore, the prompt photoresponse of the samples indicates general stability of the photocurrents without photo-induced charging effects. FTO IO film exhibited a photocurrent density (Jsc) of 0.14 mA/cm2 at 1.23 VRHE, whilst the substantially larger photocurrent densities were achieved by the FTO/CuWO4(4 cycles) with a Jsc of 0.42 mA/cm2, followed by the FTO/CuWO4(8 cycles) possessing a Jsc of 0.24 mA/cm2 at 1.23 VRHE. Compared with the FTO IO film, the FTO/CuWO4(4 cycles) IO films attained approximately 3-fold enhancement emphasizing the positive role of heterojunction FTO-CuWO4 combination as a core-shell structure improving the photoactivity of FTO or CuWO4 film under illumination. This photocurrent densities is a little bit lower that the recently reported the highest value (0.58 mA/cm2 at 0.8 V VRHE) and exist in the meaningful value [19]. However, increasing the amount of CuWO4 loading reversibly, the Jsc was rapidly degraded, probably due to the mechanically unstable contact between FTO IO and CuWO4 layers, resulting in rapid charge recombination. Furthermore, the modification of FTO IO structure with a CuWO4 layer resulted in the anodic shift of the onset potential by ca. 150 mV, compared with (0.36 V) observed for the base FTO IO electrode (not shown here). However, the magnitude of the photocurrent was extremely low and possibly lost in the background signal due to the high overpotential in this region. As a control sample, the CuWO4 film on the FTO substrate was also grown under the same experimental condition, showing no photoresponse in the entire potential range (not shown here). To intimately examine the photoresponse under visible light from the CuWO4 layer with an Eg of approximately 2.5 eV, the chopped on/off LSVs were again measured using a 400 nm cutoff filter and the results are presented in Figure 5(b). Unexpectedly, a significant Jsc (0.1 mA/cm2 at 1.23 VRHE) from the CuWO4 layer (4 cycles) was achieved under visible light coinciding with the sequence obtained from the LSVs under full solar illumination. Further CuWO4 layer (8 cycles) also showed the degradation of Jsc under visible light.
To review the generation of photocurrent density, IPCE measurements were carried out at 1.0 V vs RHE in the 0.5 M Na2SO4 solution, as depicted in Fig. 5(c). The FTO IO film showed the typical photoresponse of FTO material corresponding to a maximum IPCE of 3.42% at 315 nm and an onset potential of 385 nm. Furthermore, the FTO/CuWO4 IO films exhibit two distinct peaks from the respective FTO and CuWO4 layers and have identical overall IPCE patterns. In the case of FTO/CuWO4(4 cycles), the maximum IPCE value of 9.4% was obtained at 315 nm with a broad shoulder peak caused by the CuWO4 layer, corresponding to an IPCE value of 7.45% at 390 nm, whereas the FTO/CuWO4(8 cycles) shows the maximum IPCE value of 5.89% at 315 nm with the IPCE shoulder peak of 4.17% at 390 nm. The onset wavelength of FTO/CuWO4 IO films exists in the same wavelength of 475 nm due to the light absorption of the CuWO4 layer. In general, the IPCE is obtained by the following equation [20]:
where J denotes the measured photocurrent density at a specific wavelength; λ is the wavelength of incident light; and Jlight stands for the measured irradiance at a specific wavelength. The Jsc calculated by the integration of each IPCE spectrum was similar to Jsc at 1.0 V vs. RHE in Fig. 5(a). As a whole, the FTO/CuWO4(4 cycles) film exhibits substantially enhanced photoactivity over the entire UV and near visible region, attributed to electrically conducting FTO core IO as well as the visible light absorbing CuWO4 shell layer under the favorably cascading band alignment between the FTO and CuWO4 materials.
To determine the electrochemical kinetics at each component and interfacial region in the PEC system, the EIS analysis was conducted at the frequency range of 10 kHz to 0.1 Hz at OCV under solar illumination. Fig. 5(d) shows the Nyquist plots of the FTO and FTO/CuWO4 IO films in the 0.1 M Na2SO4 solution including the suggested equivalent circuit for the simulation to obtain the exact and quantitative fitted values from each component, including Rs indicating the ohmic or series resistance including the FTO substrate, the resistance associated with the ionic conductivity in the electrolyte and the external contact resistance at the high frequency. Rct in the low and middle frequency is correlated with the semiconductor/electrolyte charge transfer resistance. Furthermore, the constant phase element (CPE) represents the non-ideal capacitance of the Helmholtz layer in the nanoporous semiconductor/electrolyte interface [21]. The quantitatively fitted data are summarized in Table 1. All samples exhibited a similar value of ~ 220 Ω, suggesting that all samples existed in the analog environment. Meanwhile, FTO IO showed significantly high Rct of approximately 18890 Ω, whereas FTO/CuWO4 IO films exhibited quite low Rct values of 8000-10000 Ω, indicating that the photogenerated holes in the FTO IO film experience more than twice the magnitude of difficulty to reach the electrolyte compared with the FTO/CuWO4(4 cycles) IO film. The introduction of CuWO4 layer on the FTO IO film passivates the surface state or trap sites in the surface region of FTO IO film, promoting rapid charge transfer in the solid-liquid interface, which induces a low Rct and finally, contributes to the enhanced PEC activity.
Fig. 5.

(a) Chopped LSV under full sun on/off cycles, (b) Chopped LSV under visible sun on/off cycles (c) IPCE spectra of FTO and FTO/CuWO4 IO films in 0.5 M Na2SO4 solution, and (d) EIS spectra under solar illumination in FTO and FTO/CuWO4 IO films including the electrical equivalent circuit in the inset of (d).

Table 1.

Quantitative values of ohmic resistance (Rs) and charge-transfer resistance (Rct) of FTO and FTO/CuWO4 IO films fitted using the suggested equivalent electrical circuit.

In summary, the electrodeposition of thin CuWO4 layer on the FTO IO film was successfully developed using cyclic voltammetry by varying the cycling number from 4 to 8 cycles. FTO/CuWO4(4 cycles) IO film exhibited the highest Jsc (0.42 mA/cm2 at 1.23 VRHE), while FTO IO film showed a Jsc of 0.14 mA/cm2 at 1.23 VRHE. The FTO/CuWO4 (8 cycles) IO film displays a Jsc of 0.24 mA/cm2 at 1.23 VRHE. An approximately 3-fold enhancement of Jsc was attained in the deposition of the optimum CuWO4 layer on FTO IO film, attributed to improved visible light absorption and favorable band alignment between CuWO4 and FTO materials (Fig. 6), accelerating the charge separation and charge transfer rate in the solid/liquid junction. On the other hand, the thick and denser CuWO4 loading on the FTO IO film induced mechanically brittle connection, reversibly increasing the charge recombination reaction, resulting in the degradation of PEC performance.
Fig. 6.

Schematic cascade of band alignment between FTO and CuWO4 materials to show the beneficial charge transfer events.


4. Conclusions

Facile FTO and FTO/CuWO4 IO films were developed via polystyrene opal template-based method and electrochemical deposition using cyclic voltammetry, exhibiting similar morphology and crystalline properties. The PEC behavior of the films was tested in 0.5 M Na2SO4 solution under solar illumination, revealing that the high Jsc of 0.42 mA/cm2 at 1.23 VRHE was achieved in the FTO/CuWO4(4 cycles) IO film, followed by the FTO/CuWO4(8 cycles) possessing a Jsc of 0.24 mA/cm2 at 1.23 VRHE and FTO IO film with a Jsc of 0.14 mA/cm2 at 1.23 VRHE. The primary enhancement factor resulted from visible light absorption by the CuWO4 layer and the cascading band alignment between CuWO4 and FTO layer promoted favorable charge separation and transfer, suppressing the charge recombination rate. Furthermore, from the Nyquist of EIS analysis, a substantially reduced Rct was attained in the FTO/CuWO4(4 cycles) IO film, establishing the surface passivation effect of nanolayer CuWO4 and the beneficial hole transfer to the electrolyte, compared with that of FTO and FTO/CuWO4(8 cycles) IO films. The original CuWO4 showing intrinsically low electrical conductivity was not effective for a photoelectrode indicated for solar water oxidation. The thin CuWO4 layer was combined with a highly conductive FTO IO structure as a skeleton resulting in synergistic effects to capture light in the visible wavelength as well provide enhanced electrical conductivity. Therefore, the heterojunction formed by the combination of appropriate materials represents a challenging and promising approach for advanced PEC device.


This research was financially supported by Chonnam National University (Grant number: 2017-2775).


[1] Y. Surendranath and D. G. Nocera, Progess in Inorganic Chemistry. 1st ed. John Wiley & sons Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 2012.

[2] R. Asahi, T. Morikawa, H. Irie and T. Ohwaki, Chem. Rev, 2014, 114(19), 9824–9852.
[3] M. G. Walter, E. L. Warren, J. R. McKone, S. W. Boettcher, Q. Mi, E. A. Santori and N. S. Lewis, Chem. Rev, 2010, 110(11), 6446–6473.
[4] A. Fujishima and K. Honda, Nature, 1972, 238(5358), 37–38.
[5] M. Balamurugan, G. Yun, K. -S. Ahn and S. H. Kang, J. phys. chem. C, 2018, 121, 7625–7634.

[6] K. Sivula, F. L. Formal and M. Grätzel, ChemSusChem, 2011, 4(4), 432–449.
[7] C. A. Bignozzi, S. Caramori, V. Cristino, R. Argazzi, L. Meda and A. Tacca, Chem. Soc. Rev, 2013, 42(6), 2228–2246.
[8] K. M. Nam, E. A. Cheon, W. J. Shin and A. J. Bard, Langmuir, 2015, 31(39), 10897–10903.
[9] O. Yu. Khyzhun, V. L. Bekenev and Yu. M. Solonin, J. Alloys. Comped, 2009, 480, 184–189.
[10] S. Chen, M. N. Hossain and A. Chen, ChemElectroChem, 2018, 5(3), 523–530.
[11] C. R. Lhermitte and B. M. Bartlett, Acc. Chem. Res, 2016, 49(6), 1121–1129.
[12] D. Bohra and W. A. Smith, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys, 2015, 17(15), 9857–9866.
[13] M. Davi, A. Drichel, M. Mann, T. Scholz, F. Schrader, A. Rokicinska, P. Kustrowski, R. Dronskowski and A. Slabon, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2017, 121(47), 26265–26274.
[14] G. Yun, M. Balamurugan, H. -S. Kim, K. -S. Ahn and S. H. Kang, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2016, 120(11), 5906–5915.
[15] Y. Gun, G. Y. Song, V. H. Quy, J. Heo, H. Lee, K. -S. Ahn and S. H. Kang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7, 20292–20303.
[16] J. E. Yourey and B. M. Bartlett, J. Mater. Chem, 2011, 21(21), 7651–7660.
[17] R. C. Schroden, M. Al-Daous, C. F. Blanford and A. Stein, Chem. Mater, 2002, 14(8), 3305–3315.
[18] J. Ruiz-Fuertes, D. Errandonea, A. Segura, F. J. Manjón, Z. Zhu and C. Y. Tu, High Pressure Res., 2008, 28(4), 565–570.
[19] M. Zhou, Z. Liu, X. Li and Z. Liu, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2018, 57(18), 6210–6217.
[20] J. Li and N. Wu, Catal. Sci. Technol, 2015, 5, 1360–1384.
[21] S. K. Pilli, T. G. Deutsch, T. E. Furtak, L. D. Brown, J. A. Turner and A. M. Herring, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys, 2013, 15(9), 3273–3278.


Browse all articles >

Editorial Office
E-mail: journal@kecs.or.kr    Tel: +82-2-568-9392    Fax: +82-2-568-5931                   

Copyright © 2022 by The Korean Electrochemical Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next